Clinical Impact of Poorly Differentiated Cluster at the Invasive Front in Colorectal Cancer Invading beyond the Muscle Layer

Q4 Medicine
K. Yoshimatsu, M. Satake, T. Kono, Shin-ichi Asaka, Megumi Sano, A. Kodera, Hiroyuki Maeda, Hideyuki Yokokawa, Yasufumi Yamada, S. Okayama, H. Yokomizo, S. Shiozawa
{"title":"Clinical Impact of Poorly Differentiated Cluster at the Invasive Front in Colorectal Cancer Invading beyond the Muscle Layer","authors":"K. Yoshimatsu, M. Satake, T. Kono, Shin-ichi Asaka, Megumi Sano, A. Kodera, Hiroyuki Maeda, Hideyuki Yokokawa, Yasufumi Yamada, S. Okayama, H. Yokomizo, S. Shiozawa","doi":"10.4993/acrt.28.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The clinicopathological significance of poorly differentiated cluster (PDC) at the invasive front in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported. We analyzed whether PDC reflects malignant findings in patients with CRC invading beyond the muscle layer. Patients and methods: Sixty-eight patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and June 2016 for CRC invading beyond the T3 (median observation period: 32.2 months) were enrolled. The relationship between PDC and clinicopatho- logical factors was analyzed. PDC was graded based on the criteria described in a report by Ueno H et al. Results: Tumor location was at the proximal colon in 26 cases, distal colon in 34 cases, and rectum in eight cases. The number of cases with ly2,3 and v2,3 was 24 and 38, respectively. Thirty-eight cases had node positive and 11 cases had distant metastases, including 10 cases with hematogenous metastasis and four cases with peritoneal metastasis. The number of cases with stages II, III, and IV was 28, 28, and 12, respectively. The number of cases with PDC grades 1 (G1), 2 (G2), and 3 (G3) was 48, 15, and 5, respectively. A PDC G2 or G3 is a risk factor for lymph node and distant metastases. Cases with PDC G2 or G3 had significantly poor overall survival (OS) ( p < 0.0001). In cases with curability (cur) A resection for stage II or III, disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were significantly poorer in cases with PDC G2 or G3 ( p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0049, respectively). Conclusion: Analyses concerning PDC at the invasive front in cases with CRC invading beyond the muscle layer were per- formed. As the stage progresses, cases with PDC G2 and G3 increased significantly. In cases with PDC G2 and G3, the DFS and OS were significantly poorer. These results suggest that PDC is a malignant predictor in patients with CRC invading the T3 or deeper.","PeriodicalId":35647,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4993/acrt.28.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinicopathological significance of poorly differentiated cluster (PDC) at the invasive front in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported. We analyzed whether PDC reflects malignant findings in patients with CRC invading beyond the muscle layer. Patients and methods: Sixty-eight patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and June 2016 for CRC invading beyond the T3 (median observation period: 32.2 months) were enrolled. The relationship between PDC and clinicopatho- logical factors was analyzed. PDC was graded based on the criteria described in a report by Ueno H et al. Results: Tumor location was at the proximal colon in 26 cases, distal colon in 34 cases, and rectum in eight cases. The number of cases with ly2,3 and v2,3 was 24 and 38, respectively. Thirty-eight cases had node positive and 11 cases had distant metastases, including 10 cases with hematogenous metastasis and four cases with peritoneal metastasis. The number of cases with stages II, III, and IV was 28, 28, and 12, respectively. The number of cases with PDC grades 1 (G1), 2 (G2), and 3 (G3) was 48, 15, and 5, respectively. A PDC G2 or G3 is a risk factor for lymph node and distant metastases. Cases with PDC G2 or G3 had significantly poor overall survival (OS) ( p < 0.0001). In cases with curability (cur) A resection for stage II or III, disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were significantly poorer in cases with PDC G2 or G3 ( p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0049, respectively). Conclusion: Analyses concerning PDC at the invasive front in cases with CRC invading beyond the muscle layer were per- formed. As the stage progresses, cases with PDC G2 and G3 increased significantly. In cases with PDC G2 and G3, the DFS and OS were significantly poorer. These results suggest that PDC is a malignant predictor in patients with CRC invading the T3 or deeper.
侵袭前沿低分化簇对侵犯肌层以外结直肠癌癌症侵袭的临床影响
前言:报道了侵袭前沿低分化簇(PDC)在癌症(CRC)中的临床病理意义。我们分析了PDC是否反映了侵犯肌肉层以外的CRC患者的恶性表现。患者和方法:在2015年1月至2016年6月期间,68名因CRC侵犯超过T3(中位观察期:32.2个月)而接受手术的患者被纳入研究。分析PDC与临床病理因素的关系。PDC根据Ueno H等人的一份报告中描述的标准进行分级。结果:26例肿瘤位于近端结肠,34例位于远端结肠,8例位于直肠。ly2,3和v2,3的病例数分别为24例和38例。38例淋巴结阳性,11例远处转移,其中10例为血行转移,4例为腹膜转移。II期、III期和IV期的病例数分别为28例、28例和12例。PDC 1级(G1)、2级(G2)和3级(G3)的病例数分别为48例、15例和5例。PDC G2或G3是淋巴结和远处转移的危险因素。PDC G2或G3患者的总生存率(OS)明显较差(p<0.0001)。在可治愈性(cur)病例中,PDC G2或G2患者的无病生存率(DFS)和OS明显较差(分别为p=0.0022和p=0.0049)。结论:对侵犯肌层以上的CRC患者侵犯前沿PDC进行了分析。随着该阶段的进展,PDC G2和G3的病例显著增加。在PDC G2和G3的病例中,DFS和OS明显较差。这些结果表明PDC是侵犯T3或更深的CRC患者的恶性预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy
Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信