Adverse Childhood Experiences Associated with Greater Internalization of Weight Stigma in Women with Excess Weight.

Obesities Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-03 DOI:10.3390/obesities1010005
Natalie G Keirns, Cindy E Tsotsoros, Samantha Addante, Harley M Layman, Jaimie Arona Krems, Rebecca L Pearl, A Janet Tomiyama, Misty A W Hawkins
{"title":"Adverse Childhood Experiences Associated with Greater Internalization of Weight Stigma in Women with Excess Weight.","authors":"Natalie G Keirns, Cindy E Tsotsoros, Samantha Addante, Harley M Layman, Jaimie Arona Krems, Rebecca L Pearl, A Janet Tomiyama, Misty A W Hawkins","doi":"10.3390/obesities1010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may be an early life factor associated with adult weight stigma via biological (e.g., stress response), cognitive (e.g., self-criticism/deprecation), and/or emotional (e.g., shame) mechanisms. This pilot study investigated relationships between ACEs and internalized and experienced weight stigma in adult women with overweight/obesity and explored differential relationships between weight stigma and ACE subtypes (i.e., abuse, neglect, household dysfunction). Adult women (68% white, <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 33 ± 10 years, <i>M</i> <sub>BMI</sub> = 33.7 ± 7.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) completed measures of ACEs (ACE Questionnaire), internalized weight stigma (IWS; Weight Bias Internalization Scale-Modified; WBIS-M), and lifetime experiences of weight stigma (yes/no). Data were analyzed with linear and logistic regression (<i>n</i> = 46), adjusting for age, race, and body mass index (BMI). Linear regressions revealed a positive association between ACE and WBIS-M scores (<i>β</i> = 0.40, <i>p</i> = 0.006), which was driven by Abuse-type ACEs (<i>β</i> = 0.48, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Relationships between WBIS-M scores and Neglect- and Household-Dysfunction-type ACEs did not reach significance (<i>β</i> = 0.20, <i>p</i> = 0.173; <i>β</i> = -0.16, <i>p</i> = 0.273). Though descriptive statistics revealed greater rates of experienced weight stigma endorsement by those with high-3+ ACEs (81%) vs. medium-1-2 ACEs (67%) or low/no-0 ACEs (60%), ACE scores were not significantly associated with experienced weight stigma in logistic regression (Wald = 1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.244, OR = 1.324, 95%, CI = 0.825-2.125). ACEs may be an early life factor that increase the risk for internalizing weight stigma in adulthood. Larger studies should confirm this relationship and follow-up on descriptive findings suggesting a potential association between ACEs and experienced weight stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93598,"journal":{"name":"Obesities","volume":"1 1","pages":"49-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9033161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities1010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may be an early life factor associated with adult weight stigma via biological (e.g., stress response), cognitive (e.g., self-criticism/deprecation), and/or emotional (e.g., shame) mechanisms. This pilot study investigated relationships between ACEs and internalized and experienced weight stigma in adult women with overweight/obesity and explored differential relationships between weight stigma and ACE subtypes (i.e., abuse, neglect, household dysfunction). Adult women (68% white, M age = 33 ± 10 years, M BMI = 33.7 ± 7.2 kg/m2) completed measures of ACEs (ACE Questionnaire), internalized weight stigma (IWS; Weight Bias Internalization Scale-Modified; WBIS-M), and lifetime experiences of weight stigma (yes/no). Data were analyzed with linear and logistic regression (n = 46), adjusting for age, race, and body mass index (BMI). Linear regressions revealed a positive association between ACE and WBIS-M scores (β = 0.40, p = 0.006), which was driven by Abuse-type ACEs (β = 0.48, p = 0.009). Relationships between WBIS-M scores and Neglect- and Household-Dysfunction-type ACEs did not reach significance (β = 0.20, p = 0.173; β = -0.16, p = 0.273). Though descriptive statistics revealed greater rates of experienced weight stigma endorsement by those with high-3+ ACEs (81%) vs. medium-1-2 ACEs (67%) or low/no-0 ACEs (60%), ACE scores were not significantly associated with experienced weight stigma in logistic regression (Wald = 1.36, p = 0.244, OR = 1.324, 95%, CI = 0.825-2.125). ACEs may be an early life factor that increase the risk for internalizing weight stigma in adulthood. Larger studies should confirm this relationship and follow-up on descriptive findings suggesting a potential association between ACEs and experienced weight stigma.

儿童期不良经历与超重女性体重耻辱感内化相关
儿童不良经历(ACE)可能是通过生物学(如压力反应)、认知(如自我批评/贬低)和/或情感(如羞耻)机制与成人体重污名相关的早期因素。这项试点研究调查了ACE与超重/肥胖成年女性内在和经历的体重污名之间的关系,并探讨了体重污名与ACE亚型(即虐待、忽视、家庭功能障碍)之间的差异关系。成年女性(68%为白人,Mage=33±10岁,MBMI=33.7±7.2 kg/m2)完成了ACE(ACE问卷)、内化体重污名(IWS;体重偏差内化量表——修改;WBIS-M)和终身体重污名经历(是/否)的测量。数据采用线性和逻辑回归分析(n=46),并根据年龄、种族和体重指数(BMI)进行调整。线性回归分析显示ACE与WBIS-M评分呈正相关(β=0.40、p=0.006),这是由滥用型ACE驱动的(β=0.48,p=0.009)。WBIS-M评分与忽视型和家庭功能障碍型ACE之间的关系没有达到显著性(β=0.20,p=0.173;β=-0.16,p=0.273(60%),在逻辑回归中,ACE评分与经历过的体重污名没有显著相关性(Wald=1.36,p=0.244,OR=1.324,95%,CI=0.825–2.125)。ACE可能是一个早期生活因素,会增加成年后内化体重污名的风险。更大规模的研究应该证实这种关系,并对描述性研究结果进行随访,这些研究结果表明ACE与经历过的体重污名之间存在潜在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信