Communicating in Three Dimensions

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Adam N. Rabinowitz
{"title":"Communicating in Three Dimensions","authors":"Adam N. Rabinowitz","doi":"10.14434/sdh.v3i1.25386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After excavating the Praedia of Iulia Felix at Pompeii in 1755, architect Karl Weber published the building with an axionometric illustration that showed the remains in three-dimensional perspective. In doing so, Weber communicated additional information about the form of the building in a manner that was both visually accessible to a lay audience and sufficiently “scientific” for a scholarly one. By contrast, digital 3D documentation methods in current archaeological practice can reinforce a division between “scientific” models intended for internal consumption by the project that produces them, and external communication in the form of lower-quality online digital displays. Using recent fieldwork at the Greek colonial site of Histria in Romania as a case-study, this paper explores the space between high-resolution contextualized 3D documentation used only by an internal audience and down-scaled, decontextualized 3D content designed for public consumption. In particular, it explores whether measurable 3D models derived from photogrammetrical capture are useful in communicating excavation results to non-specialists – and if so, in what ways. It presents several scenarios for the role of high-quality 3D documentation in both formal and informal scholarly communication, and discusses the potential for the reuse of such documentation to answer new research questions.","PeriodicalId":52934,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Digital Heritage","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Digital Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v3i1.25386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After excavating the Praedia of Iulia Felix at Pompeii in 1755, architect Karl Weber published the building with an axionometric illustration that showed the remains in three-dimensional perspective. In doing so, Weber communicated additional information about the form of the building in a manner that was both visually accessible to a lay audience and sufficiently “scientific” for a scholarly one. By contrast, digital 3D documentation methods in current archaeological practice can reinforce a division between “scientific” models intended for internal consumption by the project that produces them, and external communication in the form of lower-quality online digital displays. Using recent fieldwork at the Greek colonial site of Histria in Romania as a case-study, this paper explores the space between high-resolution contextualized 3D documentation used only by an internal audience and down-scaled, decontextualized 3D content designed for public consumption. In particular, it explores whether measurable 3D models derived from photogrammetrical capture are useful in communicating excavation results to non-specialists – and if so, in what ways. It presents several scenarios for the role of high-quality 3D documentation in both formal and informal scholarly communication, and discusses the potential for the reuse of such documentation to answer new research questions.
三维沟通
1755年,建筑师卡尔·韦伯(Karl Weber)在庞贝挖掘出尤利亚·菲利克斯文献后,发表了这座建筑,并配以轴测图,以三维视角展示了遗迹。在这样做的过程中,韦伯以一种既能让外行观众在视觉上理解,又能让学术人士充分“科学”的方式传达了关于建筑形式的额外信息。相比之下,在目前的考古实践中,数字3D记录方法可以强化“科学”模型之间的分歧,即用于生产它们的项目内部消费的“科学”模型,以及以低质量在线数字显示形式进行的外部交流。本文以最近在罗马尼亚希斯特里亚希腊殖民遗址的实地考察为例,探讨了仅供内部观众使用的高分辨率情境化3D文档与为公众消费设计的缩小规模、非情境化3D内容之间的空间。特别是,它探讨了从摄影测量捕获中获得的可测量的3D模型在向非专业人员传达挖掘结果方面是否有用,如果有用,则以何种方式有用。它提出了高质量3D文档在正式和非正式学术交流中的作用的几个场景,并讨论了重用这些文档以回答新的研究问题的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Digital Heritage
Studies in Digital Heritage Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信