Eine Genealogie sorgender Sicherheit: Sorgeregime von der Antike bis zum Anthropozän

Andreas Folkers
{"title":"Eine Genealogie sorgender Sicherheit: Sorgeregime von der Antike bis zum Anthropozän","authors":"Andreas Folkers","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.2.1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes an alternative genealogy of security by exploring the nexus of security and care from antiquity to the present. In Greek and Roman antiquity, securitas – literally ‚carefree’ – designated a state of inner peace. With the rise of Christianity, pastoral power introduced a new regime of securing care. The pastoral care for the soul is supposed to secure salvation, whereas Christian Caritas established new forms of care for those in need (Fursorge). Modern biopolitical dispositives of security continued this tradition of care for others with the means of modern welfarism. Security dispositives organized new forms of social care (Sozialfursorge) and became increasingly concerned with the security of supply (Versorgungssicherheit) of vital infrastructural services. Since the second half of the twentieth century, a new form of care for the environment has emerged. The precautionary principle (Vorsorgeprinzip) seeks to prevent irreversible environmental change, whereas new environmental disposal and remediation practices (Entsorgung) cope with the residuals of industrial modernity. The genealogy shows the wide variety and historical flexibility of forms of security care. Conceptually the paper argues that, in contrast to sovereign and statist security technologies like the police and the military, securing care represents a positive, yet nevertheless problematic form of security. This provides new insights for a critique of security.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"13 1","pages":"16-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.2.1044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proposes an alternative genealogy of security by exploring the nexus of security and care from antiquity to the present. In Greek and Roman antiquity, securitas – literally ‚carefree’ – designated a state of inner peace. With the rise of Christianity, pastoral power introduced a new regime of securing care. The pastoral care for the soul is supposed to secure salvation, whereas Christian Caritas established new forms of care for those in need (Fursorge). Modern biopolitical dispositives of security continued this tradition of care for others with the means of modern welfarism. Security dispositives organized new forms of social care (Sozialfursorge) and became increasingly concerned with the security of supply (Versorgungssicherheit) of vital infrastructural services. Since the second half of the twentieth century, a new form of care for the environment has emerged. The precautionary principle (Vorsorgeprinzip) seeks to prevent irreversible environmental change, whereas new environmental disposal and remediation practices (Entsorgung) cope with the residuals of industrial modernity. The genealogy shows the wide variety and historical flexibility of forms of security care. Conceptually the paper argues that, in contrast to sovereign and statist security technologies like the police and the military, securing care represents a positive, yet nevertheless problematic form of security. This provides new insights for a critique of security.
关爱安全的谱系:从古代到人类世的担忧
本文通过探索从古代到现在的安全与关怀的关系,提出了另一种安全谱系。在古希腊和古罗马时代,securitas(字面意思是无忧无虑)指的是一种内心平静的状态。随着基督教的兴起,牧师的权力引入了一种新的保障照顾制度。对灵魂的牧灵关怀被认为是确保救赎,而基督教明爱为那些有需要的人建立了新的关怀形式(Fursorge)。现代对安全的生命政治否定以现代福利主义的手段延续了这种关心他人的传统。安全部门组织了新形式的社会关怀(社会关怀),并日益关注重要基础设施服务的供应安全。自二十世纪下半叶以来,出现了一种新的环境保护形式。预防性原则(Vorsorgeprinzip)旨在防止不可逆转的环境变化,而新的环境处理和补救措施(Entsorgung)应对工业现代性的残余。家谱显示了保障形式的多样性和历史灵活性。从概念上讲,本文认为,与警察和军队等主权和中央集权的安全技术相比,安全护理代表了一种积极的,但仍然存在问题的安全形式。这为安全性批判提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信