The Jew, the Arab, the Black: La Haine and the Structure of Anti-Black Violence

Q3 Arts and Humanities
R. Cherian
{"title":"The Jew, the Arab, the Black: La Haine and the Structure of Anti-Black Violence","authors":"R. Cherian","doi":"10.2979/blackcamera.14.2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay places Gilles Deleuze’s work on cinema and psychoanalysis in conversation with critical Black studies through an interrogation of the film La Haine (1995, France), directed by Mathieu Kassovitz. I argue that while the action and dialogue that construct La Haine convey a progressive, perhaps even apparently radical, critique of race and policing towards the embrace of a multiracial coalition politics, the cinematic structure of La Haine administers what Deleuze calls a shock to thought that reveals the anti-Black structure of not simply European civil society, but the anti-Black relations among its historical and timeless Others—the Jew, the Arab, and the Black—such that the political desires and aspirations portrayed in the dialogue are rendered untenable through the cinematic structure. In other words, the critique of civil society La Haine offers on the level of structure and composition is one that exceeds and undermines any conscious desire for love, reparation, or coalition. By problematizing ethno-religious categories deployed by Kassovitz, the essay briefly asks how the representation of “religious” and “racial” bodies in La Haine operates within the same biocentric logic of the modern state to the extent that it represses the historico-material and psycho-affective origins of Jewish, Arab, and Black Enmity with regard to secular civil society and the Human. If so, then while Kassovitz’s best efforts to create a narrative arc and recuperative gesture toward reconciliation and redemption between the multiracial coalition of people and the police ultimately collapse into the flatline of anti-Blackness, the impossible reconciliation between the Black and secular civil society does not foreclose, following Selamawit Terrefe, the confluence and unflinching embrace of monstrosity, hatred, and enmity among the human’s familiar and radical Others—the so-called Jew, Arab, and Black.","PeriodicalId":42749,"journal":{"name":"Black Camera","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Camera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/blackcamera.14.2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay places Gilles Deleuze’s work on cinema and psychoanalysis in conversation with critical Black studies through an interrogation of the film La Haine (1995, France), directed by Mathieu Kassovitz. I argue that while the action and dialogue that construct La Haine convey a progressive, perhaps even apparently radical, critique of race and policing towards the embrace of a multiracial coalition politics, the cinematic structure of La Haine administers what Deleuze calls a shock to thought that reveals the anti-Black structure of not simply European civil society, but the anti-Black relations among its historical and timeless Others—the Jew, the Arab, and the Black—such that the political desires and aspirations portrayed in the dialogue are rendered untenable through the cinematic structure. In other words, the critique of civil society La Haine offers on the level of structure and composition is one that exceeds and undermines any conscious desire for love, reparation, or coalition. By problematizing ethno-religious categories deployed by Kassovitz, the essay briefly asks how the representation of “religious” and “racial” bodies in La Haine operates within the same biocentric logic of the modern state to the extent that it represses the historico-material and psycho-affective origins of Jewish, Arab, and Black Enmity with regard to secular civil society and the Human. If so, then while Kassovitz’s best efforts to create a narrative arc and recuperative gesture toward reconciliation and redemption between the multiracial coalition of people and the police ultimately collapse into the flatline of anti-Blackness, the impossible reconciliation between the Black and secular civil society does not foreclose, following Selamawit Terrefe, the confluence and unflinching embrace of monstrosity, hatred, and enmity among the human’s familiar and radical Others—the so-called Jew, Arab, and Black.
犹太人,阿拉伯人,黑人:拉海恩和反黑人暴力的结构
摘要:本文通过对马蒂厄·卡索维茨(Mathieu Kassovitz)执导的电影《海恩》(La Haine,1995,法国)的审问,将吉勒·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)在电影和精神分析方面的工作与批判性黑人研究进行了对话。我认为,虽然构建《拉海恩》的行动和对话传达了一种进步的,甚至可能是明显激进的,对种族和治安的批判,以接受多种族联盟政治,但《拉海ne》的电影结构管理着德勒兹所说的思想冲击,揭示了反黑人的结构,而不仅仅是欧洲公民社会,但其历史上和永恒的其他人——犹太人、阿拉伯人和黑人——之间的反黑人关系,使得对话中描绘的政治欲望和愿望在电影结构中变得站不住脚。换言之,拉海恩在结构和组成层面上对公民社会的批判超越并破坏了任何对爱、补偿或联盟的自觉渴望。通过对Kassovitz提出的民族-宗教类别进行问题化,本文简要地询问了《拉海恩》中“宗教”和“种族”身体的表现是如何在现代国家的同一生物中心逻辑中运作的,以至于它压制了犹太人、阿拉伯人、,以及关于世俗公民社会和人类的黑人恩怨。如果是这样的话,尽管卡斯索维茨为在人民和警察的多种族联盟之间创造和解和救赎的叙事弧线和恢复姿态所做的最大努力最终陷入了反黑人的直线,但黑人和世俗公民社会之间不可能的和解并没有阻止,人类熟悉和激进的其他人——所谓的犹太人、阿拉伯人和黑人——对怪物、仇恨和敌意的融合和坚定拥抱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Black Camera
Black Camera FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信