A multicenter retrospective analysis of risk factors for poor outcomes after tibial pilon fractures

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Timothy Ashworth, Paul M. Alvarez, J. Laux, Sarat Ganga, R. Ostrum
{"title":"A multicenter retrospective analysis of risk factors for poor outcomes after tibial pilon fractures","authors":"Timothy Ashworth, Paul M. Alvarez, J. Laux, Sarat Ganga, R. Ostrum","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the high rate of complications associated with tibial pilon fractures, treatment often remains fairly algorithmic. This study highlights risk factors for poor outcomes to guide individualized treatment in an effort to minimize complications. Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven surgically treated pilon fractures in 151 patients over 6 yr were included. The following factors were studied: age, gender, presence of diabetes, smoking status, presence of an open fracture, Association for Osteosynthesis-Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification, number of plates and incisions, time to external fixator placement, time to definitive treatment, and incisions used. The two primary outcomes were nonunion and infection/wound complications requiring re-operation. Univariate tests were used for each variable in isolation. Multiple regression models were used to control important covariates. Interactions between the number of incisions, patient history of smoking, the number of plates utilized, and patient history of diabetes were analyzed. Results: Male gender, open fracture, history of diabetes and increasing time to fixation were associated with infection/wound complications. Open fractures were strongly associated with the development of nonunion. The interaction model for diabetes and increasing number of plates showed that each additional plate used when treating patients with a history of diabetes was associated with 6.08 times higher odds of developing an infection, a marginally significant result (P=0.065). Conclusions: Increased caution may be warranted when treating tibial pilon fractures in patients with certain risk factors. In patients with a history of diabetes, the additional dissection needed to place more implants may contribute to higher rates of infection. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"452 - 457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the high rate of complications associated with tibial pilon fractures, treatment often remains fairly algorithmic. This study highlights risk factors for poor outcomes to guide individualized treatment in an effort to minimize complications. Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven surgically treated pilon fractures in 151 patients over 6 yr were included. The following factors were studied: age, gender, presence of diabetes, smoking status, presence of an open fracture, Association for Osteosynthesis-Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification, number of plates and incisions, time to external fixator placement, time to definitive treatment, and incisions used. The two primary outcomes were nonunion and infection/wound complications requiring re-operation. Univariate tests were used for each variable in isolation. Multiple regression models were used to control important covariates. Interactions between the number of incisions, patient history of smoking, the number of plates utilized, and patient history of diabetes were analyzed. Results: Male gender, open fracture, history of diabetes and increasing time to fixation were associated with infection/wound complications. Open fractures were strongly associated with the development of nonunion. The interaction model for diabetes and increasing number of plates showed that each additional plate used when treating patients with a history of diabetes was associated with 6.08 times higher odds of developing an infection, a marginally significant result (P=0.065). Conclusions: Increased caution may be warranted when treating tibial pilon fractures in patients with certain risk factors. In patients with a history of diabetes, the additional dissection needed to place more implants may contribute to higher rates of infection. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III.
胫骨pilon骨折预后不良危险因素的多中心回顾性分析
背景:尽管与胫骨pilon骨折相关的并发症发生率很高,但治疗通常仍然是相当算法的。这项研究强调了不良结果的危险因素,以指导个体化治疗,努力减少并发症。方法:对151例6年以上经手术治疗的157例枕部骨折患者进行回顾性分析。研究了以下因素:年龄、性别、是否患有糖尿病、是否吸烟、是否有开放性骨折、骨合成-骨科创伤协会(AO/OTA)骨折分类、钢板和切口数量、放置外固定架的时间、最终治疗的时间和使用的切口。两个主要结果是不愈合和需要再次手术的感染/伤口并发症。对每个变量单独使用单变量检验。采用多元回归模型控制重要协变量。分析切口数量、患者吸烟史、使用钢板数量和患者糖尿病史之间的相互作用。结果:男性、开放性骨折、糖尿病史和固定时间增加与感染/伤口并发症相关。开放性骨折与骨不愈合的发生密切相关。糖尿病与增加钢板数量的相互作用模型显示,在治疗糖尿病病史的患者时,每增加一个钢板,发生感染的几率就会增加6.08倍,这是一个边际显著的结果(P=0.065)。结论:对于具有某些危险因素的患者,在治疗胫骨pilon骨折时应更加谨慎。对于有糖尿病病史的患者,放置更多植入物所需的额外解剖可能会导致更高的感染率。证据等级:预后III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信