INDIGENOUS CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STRATEGIES. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

IF 0.2 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Shimelis Tamirat, Kenenisa Lemi
{"title":"INDIGENOUS CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STRATEGIES. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Shimelis Tamirat, Kenenisa Lemi","doi":"10.24193/csq.43.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several possible ways to respond to conflict situations as a managerial intervention to solve it. The current understanding of such conflict management strategies was framed without adequately considering indigenous practices. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to explore the contributors and determinants of the effectiveness of indigenous conflict management strategies. The findings indicated that factors such as shared dialogue, empowering indigenous structures, symbolic ritual procedures, flexibility, ease, friendliness, compassion, less costless, timeliness, transparency, inclusiveness, adequate interests representation, power sharing, and diversity recognition contributed positively to its effectiveness. Nonetheless, poor language choice and communication barriers, lack of legal empowerment, corrupt behavior of negotiators, and negative attitudes became hindrances to its value. This review identified that indigenous conflict management strategies have valuable managerial application potential in the field of conflict interventions. However, the review was limited to only positive and negative contributors to indigenous conflict management strategies. Keywords: Conflict, Conflict management, Effectiveness, Indigenous strategies, Systematic review","PeriodicalId":55922,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Studies Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/csq.43.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several possible ways to respond to conflict situations as a managerial intervention to solve it. The current understanding of such conflict management strategies was framed without adequately considering indigenous practices. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to explore the contributors and determinants of the effectiveness of indigenous conflict management strategies. The findings indicated that factors such as shared dialogue, empowering indigenous structures, symbolic ritual procedures, flexibility, ease, friendliness, compassion, less costless, timeliness, transparency, inclusiveness, adequate interests representation, power sharing, and diversity recognition contributed positively to its effectiveness. Nonetheless, poor language choice and communication barriers, lack of legal empowerment, corrupt behavior of negotiators, and negative attitudes became hindrances to its value. This review identified that indigenous conflict management strategies have valuable managerial application potential in the field of conflict interventions. However, the review was limited to only positive and negative contributors to indigenous conflict management strategies. Keywords: Conflict, Conflict management, Effectiveness, Indigenous strategies, Systematic review
土著冲突管理:有助于战略有效性的因素。系统综述
有几种可能的方法可以作为解决冲突的管理干预措施来应对冲突局势。目前对这种冲突管理战略的理解是在没有充分考虑当地做法的情况下制定的。因此,本次系统审查的目的是探讨土著冲突管理战略有效性的因素和决定因素。研究结果表明,共同对话、赋予土著结构权力、象征性仪式程序、灵活性、便利性、友好性、同情心、成本较低、及时性、透明度、包容性、充分的利益代表性、权力分享和多样性认可等因素对其有效性起到了积极作用。尽管如此,糟糕的语言选择和沟通障碍、缺乏法律授权、谈判人员的腐败行为以及消极态度成为其价值的障碍。这项审查表明,土著冲突管理战略在冲突干预领域具有宝贵的管理应用潜力。然而,审查仅限于对土著冲突管理战略作出积极和消极贡献。关键词:冲突、冲突管理、有效性、本土战略、系统评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict Studies Quarterly
Conflict Studies Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信