Performa Diagnostik Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) dibandingkan dengan Malnutrition Nutritional Assessment (MNA) dalam Pengkajian Malnutrisi pada Pasien Geriatri di Rawat Inap

{"title":"Performa Diagnostik Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) dibandingkan dengan Malnutrition Nutritional Assessment (MNA) dalam Pengkajian Malnutrisi pada Pasien Geriatri di Rawat Inap","authors":"","doi":"10.7454/jpdi.v10i1.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. As many as 76.6% of patients aged 60 years and above (elderly) are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition based on MNA within the first 48 hours of hospital admission. The prevalence of malnutrition varies widely depending on the population studied, the healthcare setting and the tools used for the assessment. To date, SGA is widely used in the diagnosis of malnutrition for adults and MNA for elderly patients. Recently, experts proposed empirical consensus of GLIM criteria for determining the diagnosis of malnutrition in adults. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of GLIM criteria as a new consensus in determining the diagnosis of malnutrition in comparison to MNA as a semi-gold standard for nutritional assessment in the elderly. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2022 on 103 consecutively recruited elderly patients aged ≥60 years in the Internal Medicine Wards at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM), Jakarta, Indonesia. Results. There were 91.3%, 57.3% and 54.4% malnourished elderly patients upon admission to the hospital, based on GLIM criteria, MNA-SF and MNA-LF, respectively. GLIM has good accuracy compared to both MNA-SF and MNA-LF, as long as the category of malnourished in MNA is a combination of malnutrition and at risk of malnutrition. GLIM had 97.9% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, AUC 0.93, 98.9% PPV, 77.8% NPV, 7.83 positive LR and 0.02 negative LR towards MNA-SF, and a sensitivity value of 98.9%, specificity 88.9%, AUC 0.94, PPV 98.9%, NPV 88.9%, positive LR 8.91, and negative LR 0.01 towards MNA-LF. Conclusion. GLIM showed good diagnostic accuracy to determine nutritional status in the elderly, especially upon admission to the hospital, so that appropriate early nutritional interventions can be given.","PeriodicalId":32700,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/jpdi.v10i1.1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. As many as 76.6% of patients aged 60 years and above (elderly) are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition based on MNA within the first 48 hours of hospital admission. The prevalence of malnutrition varies widely depending on the population studied, the healthcare setting and the tools used for the assessment. To date, SGA is widely used in the diagnosis of malnutrition for adults and MNA for elderly patients. Recently, experts proposed empirical consensus of GLIM criteria for determining the diagnosis of malnutrition in adults. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of GLIM criteria as a new consensus in determining the diagnosis of malnutrition in comparison to MNA as a semi-gold standard for nutritional assessment in the elderly. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2022 on 103 consecutively recruited elderly patients aged ≥60 years in the Internal Medicine Wards at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM), Jakarta, Indonesia. Results. There were 91.3%, 57.3% and 54.4% malnourished elderly patients upon admission to the hospital, based on GLIM criteria, MNA-SF and MNA-LF, respectively. GLIM has good accuracy compared to both MNA-SF and MNA-LF, as long as the category of malnourished in MNA is a combination of malnutrition and at risk of malnutrition. GLIM had 97.9% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, AUC 0.93, 98.9% PPV, 77.8% NPV, 7.83 positive LR and 0.02 negative LR towards MNA-SF, and a sensitivity value of 98.9%, specificity 88.9%, AUC 0.94, PPV 98.9%, NPV 88.9%, positive LR 8.91, and negative LR 0.01 towards MNA-LF. Conclusion. GLIM showed good diagnostic accuracy to determine nutritional status in the elderly, especially upon admission to the hospital, so that appropriate early nutritional interventions can be given.
Performa Diagnostik全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)与营养不良营养评估(MNA)在Inap治疗中老年患者营养不良研究中的比较
介绍根据MNA,多达76.6%的60岁及以上患者(老年人)在入院后的前48小时内营养不良或有营养不良的风险。营养不良的患病率因研究人群、医疗环境和评估工具的不同而有很大差异。迄今为止,SGA广泛用于成人营养不良的诊断和老年患者MNA的诊断。最近,专家们提出了GLIM标准的经验共识,以确定成人营养不良的诊断。本研究旨在调查GLIM标准的诊断性能,与MNA作为老年人营养评估的半金标准相比,GLIM标准是确定营养不良诊断的新共识。方法。2022年1月至4月,在印度尼西亚雅加达Cipto Mangukusumo医生医院(RSCM)内科病房对103名年龄≥60岁的连续招募的老年患者进行了一项横断面研究。后果根据GLIM标准、MNA-SF和MNA-LF,入院时营养不良的老年患者分别为91.3%、57.3%和54.4%。与MNA-SF和MNA-LF相比,GLIM具有良好的准确性,只要MNA中营养不良的类别是营养不良和营养不良风险的组合。GLIM对MNA-SF的敏感性为97.9%,特异性为87.5%,AUC为0.93,PPV为98.9%,NPV为77.8%,阳性LR为7.83,阴性LR为0.02,对MNA-LF的敏感性值为98.9%、特异性为88.9%、AUC为0.9 4,PPV 98.9%、NPV为88.9%,阳性LR 8.91,阴性LR 0.01。结论GLIM在确定老年人营养状况方面显示出良好的诊断准确性,尤其是在入院时,因此可以给予适当的早期营养干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信