{"title":"State access to encrypted communications: A symposium","authors":"C. Murphy","doi":"10.1177/1473779520980252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, 15 authors in the Journal of Cybersecurity concluded that ‘the damage that could be caused by law enforcement exceptional access requirements would be even greater today than it would have been 20 years ago’. Their article acknowledges the debate’s genesis in the 1990s controversy over the Clipper Chip—a controversy known as the ‘Crypto-Wars’. The Clipper Chip was devised by the US National Security Agency (NSA) to provide encryption but with a built-in backdoor to allow the NSA access data encrypted by it. Ultimately, the chip’s development was abandoned. Today, the expansion of digital communications makes the question even more pressing. In her consideration of these changes Laura K. Donohue highlights that:","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"49 1","pages":"153 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779520980252","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common law world review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779520980252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2015, 15 authors in the Journal of Cybersecurity concluded that ‘the damage that could be caused by law enforcement exceptional access requirements would be even greater today than it would have been 20 years ago’. Their article acknowledges the debate’s genesis in the 1990s controversy over the Clipper Chip—a controversy known as the ‘Crypto-Wars’. The Clipper Chip was devised by the US National Security Agency (NSA) to provide encryption but with a built-in backdoor to allow the NSA access data encrypted by it. Ultimately, the chip’s development was abandoned. Today, the expansion of digital communications makes the question even more pressing. In her consideration of these changes Laura K. Donohue highlights that:
2015年,《网络安全杂志》(Journal of Cybersecurity)的15位作者得出结论,“执法部门的特殊访问要求可能造成的损害比20年前更大”。他们的文章承认这场辩论起源于20世纪90年代关于克利伯芯片的争论——这场争论被称为“加密战争”。Clipper芯片是由美国国家安全局(NSA)设计的,用于提供加密功能,但内置了一个后门,允许NSA访问由其加密的数据。最终,芯片的开发被放弃了。今天,数字通信的扩展使这个问题更加紧迫。劳拉·k·多诺霍在考虑这些变化时强调: