Passively crowdsourcing images online for measuring broad-scale fly (Diptera) floral interactions and biodiversity

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Evelyn Blakeman, Aydan B. Wilson, Sarah Romer, Emi Olin, Catherine E. Scott, Viorel Popescu, B. Brodie
{"title":"Passively crowdsourcing images online for measuring broad-scale fly (Diptera) floral interactions and biodiversity","authors":"Evelyn Blakeman, Aydan B. Wilson, Sarah Romer, Emi Olin, Catherine E. Scott, Viorel Popescu, B. Brodie","doi":"10.26786/1920-7603(2023)724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flies (Diptera) represent one of the largest and most important groups of pollinators on the planet; however, little is known about the interactions between flies and flowers compared to well-known pollinators, such as bees. Understanding pollinator assemblages is key to conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services, but monitoring Diptera is time and cost intensive. Using photographs of blooming flowers taken by photographers worldwide and uploaded on internet repositories, we built a dataset of 1,275 images of fly-flower visitations and extracted fly and flower taxonomic information, flower characteristics (shape and color), and fly activity (pollen carrying and foraging). The resulting dataset shows taxonomic and other biases but can still provide an initial overview of factors that affect pollination by Diptera. We identified 22 families of flies, with blow flies (Family Calliphoridae) as the largest representative (29%) and 63 families of flowers, with Asteraceae (42%) and Apiaceae (21%) as the most abundant. Using logistic regression models, we found that the likelihood of flies visibly carrying pollen in images was determined by the interaction between flower color and shape: pollen-carrying was more likely when elongate cluster flowers were green-yellow. Fly foraging on flowers was mainly determined by flower color: flies were more likely to feed on green-yellow and white flowers. Overall, Syrphidae flies were less likely to forage for nectar than non-Syrphidae, but they were more likely to be visibly carrying pollen. While biases exist in crowdsourced fly and flower data, we show that image data collected through citizen science can offer potentially valuable information for monitoring pollinator-flower interactions and augment our understanding of","PeriodicalId":30194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2023)724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Flies (Diptera) represent one of the largest and most important groups of pollinators on the planet; however, little is known about the interactions between flies and flowers compared to well-known pollinators, such as bees. Understanding pollinator assemblages is key to conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services, but monitoring Diptera is time and cost intensive. Using photographs of blooming flowers taken by photographers worldwide and uploaded on internet repositories, we built a dataset of 1,275 images of fly-flower visitations and extracted fly and flower taxonomic information, flower characteristics (shape and color), and fly activity (pollen carrying and foraging). The resulting dataset shows taxonomic and other biases but can still provide an initial overview of factors that affect pollination by Diptera. We identified 22 families of flies, with blow flies (Family Calliphoridae) as the largest representative (29%) and 63 families of flowers, with Asteraceae (42%) and Apiaceae (21%) as the most abundant. Using logistic regression models, we found that the likelihood of flies visibly carrying pollen in images was determined by the interaction between flower color and shape: pollen-carrying was more likely when elongate cluster flowers were green-yellow. Fly foraging on flowers was mainly determined by flower color: flies were more likely to feed on green-yellow and white flowers. Overall, Syrphidae flies were less likely to forage for nectar than non-Syrphidae, but they were more likely to be visibly carrying pollen. While biases exist in crowdsourced fly and flower data, we show that image data collected through citizen science can offer potentially valuable information for monitoring pollinator-flower interactions and augment our understanding of
在线被动众包图像,用于测量大规模蝇(Diptera)花的相互作用和生物多样性
苍蝇(直翅目)是地球上最大、最重要的传粉昆虫群之一;然而,与蜜蜂等知名传粉昆虫相比,人们对苍蝇和花朵之间的相互作用知之甚少。了解传粉昆虫群落是保护生物多样性和生态系统服务的关键,但监测直翅目昆虫需要耗费时间和成本。利用世界各地摄影师拍摄并上传到互联网存储库的盛开花朵的照片,我们建立了一个由1275张蝇花访问图像组成的数据集,并提取了蝇花分类信息、花朵特征(形状和颜色)和蝇活动(花粉携带和觅食)。由此产生的数据集显示了分类学和其他方面的偏见,但仍然可以提供影响Diptera授粉的因素的初步概述。我们确定了22个蝇科,其中飞蝇科(丽蝇科)是最大的代表(29%),63个花科,其中菊科(42%)和Apiaceae(21%)是最丰富的。使用逻辑回归模型,我们发现苍蝇在图像中明显携带花粉的可能性是由花朵颜色和形状之间的相互作用决定的:当细长的簇花是绿黄色时,携带花粉的可能更大。苍蝇以花朵为食主要由花朵的颜色决定:苍蝇更可能以绿黄色和白色的花朵为食。总的来说,与非水蝇科相比,水蝇科的苍蝇不太可能觅食花蜜,但它们更有可能明显携带花粉。虽然众包的苍蝇和花朵数据存在偏见,但我们表明,通过公民科学收集的图像数据可以为监测传粉昆虫和花朵的相互作用提供潜在的有价值的信息,并增强我们对
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Journal of Pollination Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信