Longitudinal patterns in an Arkansas River Valley stream: an Application of the River Continuum Concept

A. Burgad, S. Clark, M. Furr, A. Lenard, M. E. Polett, C. Robinson, C. Sherwood, G. Spooner, S. Stoughton, S. Adams
{"title":"Longitudinal patterns in an Arkansas River Valley stream: an Application of the River Continuum Concept","authors":"A. Burgad, S. Clark, M. Furr, A. Lenard, M. E. Polett, C. Robinson, C. Sherwood, G. Spooner, S. Stoughton, S. Adams","doi":"10.54119/jaas.2017.7126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The River Continuum Concept (RCC) provides the framework for studying how lotic ecosystems vary from headwater streams to large rivers. The RCC was developed in streams in eastern deciduous forests of North America, but watershed characteristics and land uses differ across ecoregions, presenting unique opportunities to study how predictions of the RCC may differ across regions. Additionally, RCC predictions may vary due to the influence of fishes, but few studies have used fish taxa as a metric for evaluating predictions of the RCC. Our goal was to determine if RCC predictions for stream orders 1 through 5 were supported by primary producer, macroinvertebrate, and fish communities in Cadron Creek of the Arkansas River Valley. We sampled chlorophyll a, macroinvertebrates, and fishes at five stream reaches across a gradient of watershed size. Contrary to RCC predictions, chlorophyll a did not increase in concentration with catchment size. As the RCC predicts, fish and macroinvertebrate diversity increased with catchment size. Shredding and collecting macroinvertebrate taxa supported RCC predictions, respectively decreasing and increasing in composition as catchment area increased. Herbivorous and predaceous fish did not follow RCC predictions; however, surface-water column feeding fish were abundant at all sites as predicted. We hypothesize some predictions of the RCC were not supported in headwater reaches of this system due to regional differences in watershed characteristics and altered resource availability due to land use surrounding sampling sites.","PeriodicalId":30423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54119/jaas.2017.7126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The River Continuum Concept (RCC) provides the framework for studying how lotic ecosystems vary from headwater streams to large rivers. The RCC was developed in streams in eastern deciduous forests of North America, but watershed characteristics and land uses differ across ecoregions, presenting unique opportunities to study how predictions of the RCC may differ across regions. Additionally, RCC predictions may vary due to the influence of fishes, but few studies have used fish taxa as a metric for evaluating predictions of the RCC. Our goal was to determine if RCC predictions for stream orders 1 through 5 were supported by primary producer, macroinvertebrate, and fish communities in Cadron Creek of the Arkansas River Valley. We sampled chlorophyll a, macroinvertebrates, and fishes at five stream reaches across a gradient of watershed size. Contrary to RCC predictions, chlorophyll a did not increase in concentration with catchment size. As the RCC predicts, fish and macroinvertebrate diversity increased with catchment size. Shredding and collecting macroinvertebrate taxa supported RCC predictions, respectively decreasing and increasing in composition as catchment area increased. Herbivorous and predaceous fish did not follow RCC predictions; however, surface-water column feeding fish were abundant at all sites as predicted. We hypothesize some predictions of the RCC were not supported in headwater reaches of this system due to regional differences in watershed characteristics and altered resource availability due to land use surrounding sampling sites.
阿肯色河谷河流的纵向模式:河流连续体概念的应用
河流连续体概念(RCC)为研究河流生态系统从源头到大河的变化提供了框架。RCC是在北美东部落叶森林的河流中开发的,但不同生态区的流域特征和土地利用不同,这为研究RCC的预测如何在不同区域之间存在差异提供了独特的机会。此外,由于鱼类的影响,RCC预测可能会有所不同,但很少有研究使用鱼类分类群作为评估RCC预测的指标。我们的目标是确定阿肯色河谷Cadron Creek的初级生产者、大型无脊椎动物和鱼类群落是否支持溪流顺序1至5的RCC预测。我们采样了叶绿素a、大型无脊椎动物和鱼类在五个河流到达跨越分水岭大小的梯度。与RCC预测相反,叶绿素a浓度不随集水区大小而增加。正如RCC预测的那样,鱼类和大型无脊椎动物的多样性随着流域规模的增加而增加。切碎和收集大型无脊椎动物类群支持RCC预测,随着流域面积的增加,组成分别减少和增加。草食性和食肉性鱼类不符合RCC预测;但与预测结果一致,地表水柱食性鱼丰富。我们假设,由于流域特征的区域差异和采样点周围土地利用导致的资源可用性改变,该系统的源头不支持RCC的一些预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书