Storying the heartbreak

IF 0.9 4区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Nicole Harake, W. Dunlop
{"title":"Storying the heartbreak","authors":"Nicole Harake, W. Dunlop","doi":"10.1075/ni.18064.har","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We examined narratives of romantic breakups (i.e., breakup accounts) in relation to romantic attachment\n tendencies. In Study 1, participants provided accounts of difficult breakups and indicated who in the relationship initiated its dissolution. In Study 2, participants provided breakup accounts from the perspective of the initiator and the non-initiator. Breakup\n accounts were coded for levels of exploration (active reflection of the narrated experience) and resolution (emotional closure and\n a sense of resiliency). Across studies, levels of resolution were highest in self-initiated, when compared to other-initiated,\n breakup accounts. In Study 2, avoidant attachment correlated negatively with levels of resolution in self-initiated, but not\n other-initiated, breakup accounts. These results suggest that avoidantly attached individuals narrate self-initiated breakups in a\n less thoroughly processed manner than their secure peers, and that these differences in transformational processing may carry\n implications for romantic domain functioning.","PeriodicalId":46671,"journal":{"name":"Narrative Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/ni.18064.har","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18064.har","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We examined narratives of romantic breakups (i.e., breakup accounts) in relation to romantic attachment tendencies. In Study 1, participants provided accounts of difficult breakups and indicated who in the relationship initiated its dissolution. In Study 2, participants provided breakup accounts from the perspective of the initiator and the non-initiator. Breakup accounts were coded for levels of exploration (active reflection of the narrated experience) and resolution (emotional closure and a sense of resiliency). Across studies, levels of resolution were highest in self-initiated, when compared to other-initiated, breakup accounts. In Study 2, avoidant attachment correlated negatively with levels of resolution in self-initiated, but not other-initiated, breakup accounts. These results suggest that avoidantly attached individuals narrate self-initiated breakups in a less thoroughly processed manner than their secure peers, and that these differences in transformational processing may carry implications for romantic domain functioning.
讲述心碎的故事
我们研究了浪漫分手的叙述(即分手叙述)与浪漫依恋倾向的关系。在研究1中,参与者提供了艰难分手的描述,并指出是谁在关系中发起了分手。在研究2中,参与者从发起者和非发起者的角度提供了分手账户。分手记录是根据探索(对所讲述的经历的积极反映)和解决(情感闭合和恢复感)的水平进行编码的。在所有研究中,与其他主动分手账户相比,自我启动账户的解决率最高。在研究2中,回避型依恋与自我发起的分手账户中的解决水平呈负相关,但与其他发起的分手帐户无关。这些结果表明,与安全的同龄人相比,回避型依恋的个体以一种不那么彻底的方式讲述自我发起的分手,并且这些转换过程的差异可能对浪漫领域的功能产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Narrative Inquiry
Narrative Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Narrative Inquiry is devoted to providing a forum for theoretical, empirical, and methodological work on narrative. Articles appearing in Narrative Inquiry draw upon a variety of approaches and methodologies in the study of narrative as a way to give contour to experience, tradition, and values to next generations. Particular emphasis is placed on theoretical approaches to narrative and the analysis of narratives in human interaction, including those practiced by researchers in psychology, linguistics and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信