DEBATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACADEMICS AND PRACTITIONERS IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION FIELD

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Danica Fink-Hafner, T. Dagen
{"title":"DEBATING THE RELATIONSHIP\nBETWEEN ACADEMICS AND PRACTITIONERS IN THE HIGHER\nEDUCATION FIELD","authors":"Danica Fink-Hafner, T. Dagen","doi":"10.51936/tip.59.1.5-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In this article we present findings from focus\ngroups (FGs) consisting of academics and practitioners in\nthe higher education (HE) field from different parts of the\nworld, who debated their perceptions of the current state\nof the art in the HE field. The main findings, which call for\nfurther research, as well as activities of academics, practitioners\nand policymakers at various levels, are as follows: 1)\nthere is a gap between basic academic research and applied\nresearch (with the latter often not meeting the appropriate\nconceptual level), which needs to be closed; 2) this gap is\nexpressed also in the global context of the HE field; 3) multidisciplinarity,\ninterdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, methodological\nquality of both basic and applied research need\nto be developed and 4) scholars’, practitioners’ and governments’\n(policymakers’) responsibilities need to be addressed.\nKeywords: higher education (HE), research, academics,\npractitioners, government, policy","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.59.1.5-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. In this article we present findings from focus groups (FGs) consisting of academics and practitioners in the higher education (HE) field from different parts of the world, who debated their perceptions of the current state of the art in the HE field. The main findings, which call for further research, as well as activities of academics, practitioners and policymakers at various levels, are as follows: 1) there is a gap between basic academic research and applied research (with the latter often not meeting the appropriate conceptual level), which needs to be closed; 2) this gap is expressed also in the global context of the HE field; 3) multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, methodological quality of both basic and applied research need to be developed and 4) scholars’, practitioners’ and governments’ (policymakers’) responsibilities need to be addressed. Keywords: higher education (HE), research, academics, practitioners, government, policy
高等教育领域学者与实践者的关系之争
摘要在这篇文章中,我们介绍了由来自世界不同地区的高等教育领域的学者和从业者组成的焦点小组的研究结果,他们就高等教育领域当前的艺术现状进行了辩论。需要进一步研究的主要发现以及各级学者、从业者和决策者的活动如下:1)基础学术研究和应用研究之间存在差距(后者往往不符合适当的概念水平),需要缩小差距;2) 这种差距也表现在HE领域的全球背景下;3) 需要发展基础研究和应用研究的多学科性、跨学科性、多学科性和方法学质量,4)需要解决学者、从业者和政府(决策者)的责任。关键词:高等教育、研究、学术、从业者、政府、政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信