“Choice of surgical approach for the treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: A retrospective analysis from a high-volume single center in Milan, Northern Italy”

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
E. Ortolano , C. Maina , A. D'Addiego , C. Ciuffa , S.I. Rocchetti , A.A. Beneduce , M. Carlucci
{"title":"“Choice of surgical approach for the treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: A retrospective analysis from a high-volume single center in Milan, Northern Italy”","authors":"E. Ortolano ,&nbsp;C. Maina ,&nbsp;A. D'Addiego ,&nbsp;C. Ciuffa ,&nbsp;S.I. Rocchetti ,&nbsp;A.A. Beneduce ,&nbsp;M. Carlucci","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute small bowel obstruction (aSBO) is the most common cause (76%) of acute intestinal obstruction. Laparoscopy use is still controversial in aSBO and indications not yet clearly defined. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of a laparoscopic approach in aSBO by using specific pre-operative criteria for appropriate patient selection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients accepted at the Emergency Department for aSBO between January 2016 and March 2021 and performed a comparative analysis between types of treatment, considering demographics, clinical and radiological presentation, non-operative vs. operative management, intraoperative outcome, and postoperative course. We used a logistic regression to identify the variables related to surgical approach and built a predictive score upon the multivariable predictive model: the “SABO score”.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>198 patients were included in the study, of which 145 underwent surgery and 43 were successfully treated laparoscopically. Age and comorbidities were associated with open surgery (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.4–7.2, <em>p</em> = 0.006 and OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1–6.5, <em>p</em> = 0.023). A SABO score ≥ 0 identified an open approach with a sensitivity of 75.4% and a specificity of 69.8%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Laparoscopy is growing in importance even in emergency settings. Our analysis suggests that a laparoscopic approach can be safe and feasible in aSBO management. Correct patient selection appears to be the key for a successful minimally invasive approach. SABO score therefore could be helpful in choosing the correct surgical strategy for patients with aSBO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Acute small bowel obstruction (aSBO) is the most common cause (76%) of acute intestinal obstruction. Laparoscopy use is still controversial in aSBO and indications not yet clearly defined. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of a laparoscopic approach in aSBO by using specific pre-operative criteria for appropriate patient selection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients accepted at the Emergency Department for aSBO between January 2016 and March 2021 and performed a comparative analysis between types of treatment, considering demographics, clinical and radiological presentation, non-operative vs. operative management, intraoperative outcome, and postoperative course. We used a logistic regression to identify the variables related to surgical approach and built a predictive score upon the multivariable predictive model: the “SABO score”.

Results

198 patients were included in the study, of which 145 underwent surgery and 43 were successfully treated laparoscopically. Age and comorbidities were associated with open surgery (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.4–7.2, p = 0.006 and OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1–6.5, p = 0.023). A SABO score ≥ 0 identified an open approach with a sensitivity of 75.4% and a specificity of 69.8%.

Conclusions

Laparoscopy is growing in importance even in emergency settings. Our analysis suggests that a laparoscopic approach can be safe and feasible in aSBO management. Correct patient selection appears to be the key for a successful minimally invasive approach. SABO score therefore could be helpful in choosing the correct surgical strategy for patients with aSBO.

Abstract Image

“急性小肠梗阻手术入路的选择:来自意大利北部米兰一个大容量单一中心的回顾性分析”
背景:急性小肠梗阻(aSBO)是急性肠梗阻最常见的原因(76%)。腹腔镜在aSBO中的应用仍有争议,适应症尚未明确定义。本研究的目的是通过使用特定的术前标准来选择合适的患者,以证明腹腔镜入路治疗aSBO的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2021年3月在急诊科接受的aSBO患者的医疗记录,并对不同治疗类型进行比较分析,考虑人口统计学、临床和放射学表现、非手术与手术处理、术中结果和术后病程。我们使用逻辑回归来识别与手术入路相关的变量,并在多变量预测模型上建立预测评分:“SABO评分”。结果198例患者纳入研究,其中手术治疗145例,腹腔镜治疗43例。年龄和合并症与开放手术相关(OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.4-7.2, p = 0.006; OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5, p = 0.023)。如果SABO评分≥0,则采用开放入路的敏感性为75.4%,特异性为69.8%。结论即使在紧急情况下,腹腔镜检查也越来越重要。我们的分析表明腹腔镜方法在aSBO治疗中是安全可行的。正确的患者选择似乎是成功微创入路的关键。因此,SABO评分可以帮助aSBO患者选择正确的手术策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信