Lessons (not) learned on climate change adaptation policy: qualitative research on the case of floods in Western Balkan countries

Q4 Social Sciences
J. Puđak
{"title":"Lessons (not) learned on climate change adaptation policy: qualitative research on the case of floods in Western Balkan countries","authors":"J. Puđak","doi":"10.17234/SOCEKOL.28.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present the findings of our qualitative research on adaptation to climate change within the context of the major floods that hit countries in Central and South-Eastern Europe in 2014. Adaptation here refers to the response of any given social system regarding existing and expected impacts of climate change and extreme climate events. The effectiveness of the response depends on how vulnerable or how resilient a particular system is, and this includes not only technical and biophysical aspects, but also social, cultural, political and economic ones. We conducted empirical research in order to describe how actors in environmental governance structures in three countries – Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia – viewed the climate change adaptation process, and whether they recognized climate change as a trans-sectoral problem during all the phases of the 2014 flood crisis. The results show that even though most interviewees are aware of the connection between climate change and the 2014 floods, they are unable to properly address these kinds of crises. Given that in all three countries climate mitigation and adaptation measures are divided between different ministries and departments, which are not complementary, this lack of interconnectedness is thus reflected in the interviewees’ observations.","PeriodicalId":35175,"journal":{"name":"Socijalna Ekologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17234/SOCEKOL.28.1.1","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socijalna Ekologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17234/SOCEKOL.28.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper we present the findings of our qualitative research on adaptation to climate change within the context of the major floods that hit countries in Central and South-Eastern Europe in 2014. Adaptation here refers to the response of any given social system regarding existing and expected impacts of climate change and extreme climate events. The effectiveness of the response depends on how vulnerable or how resilient a particular system is, and this includes not only technical and biophysical aspects, but also social, cultural, political and economic ones. We conducted empirical research in order to describe how actors in environmental governance structures in three countries – Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia – viewed the climate change adaptation process, and whether they recognized climate change as a trans-sectoral problem during all the phases of the 2014 flood crisis. The results show that even though most interviewees are aware of the connection between climate change and the 2014 floods, they are unable to properly address these kinds of crises. Given that in all three countries climate mitigation and adaptation measures are divided between different ministries and departments, which are not complementary, this lack of interconnectedness is thus reflected in the interviewees’ observations.
关于气候变化适应政策的经验教训:对西巴尔干国家洪水情况的定性研究
在本文中,我们介绍了我们在2014年袭击中欧和东南欧国家的大洪水背景下对气候变化适应的定性研究结果。这里的适应是指任何特定社会系统对气候变化和极端气候事件的现有和预期影响的反应。应对措施的有效性取决于特定系统的脆弱性或弹性,这不仅包括技术和生物物理方面,还包括社会、文化、政治和经济方面。我们进行了实证研究,以描述波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、克罗地亚和塞尔维亚三个国家的环境治理结构参与者如何看待气候变化适应过程,以及他们是否在2014年洪水危机的所有阶段都将气候变化视为跨部门问题。结果显示,尽管大多数受访者都意识到气候变化与2014年洪水之间的联系,但他们无法妥善应对这类危机。鉴于这三个国家的气候缓解和适应措施都由不同的部委和部门负责,这些部委和部门并不互补,因此受访者的意见反映了这种缺乏相互联系的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Socijalna Ekologija
Socijalna Ekologija Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信