Reading Marx in Beirut: Disorganised Study and the Politics of Queer Utopia

Sophie Chamas
{"title":"Reading Marx in Beirut: Disorganised Study and the Politics of Queer Utopia","authors":"Sophie Chamas","doi":"10.17192/META.2020.14.8021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on ethnographic research carried out with Marxist reading groups run by a Lebanese revolutionary socialist organization. I examine the labor that Marxist theoretical practice was doing in a political conjuncture widely viewed as post-Marxist , discussing the relationship between theory and affect, and the role that affective infrastructures play in maintaining and reproducing social movements and political organisations. Drawing on Moten and Harney, I frame this intellectual labor as a form of dissonant , disorganized study - a mode of preparing for revolution by being together in brokenness and routinely generating a commitment to a particular political horizon. This form of political praxis as study unfolded within a Lebanese activist scene dominated by a pragmatic conception of politics, within which the critical labor of the radical and revolutionary left was largely considered sterile , mired in something akin to what Berlant calls cruel optimism. Drawing on Munoz, his conceptualisation of the politics of queer utopia, and his defence of utopian imaginativeness, I argue that for radical and revolutionary leftists in counter-revolutionary times, cultivating solidarity and camaraderie by maintaining a space of study that could enable technologies of both self and collective constituted a productive political act.","PeriodicalId":30565,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Topics Arguments","volume":"14 1","pages":"143-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Topics Arguments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17192/META.2020.14.8021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article draws on ethnographic research carried out with Marxist reading groups run by a Lebanese revolutionary socialist organization. I examine the labor that Marxist theoretical practice was doing in a political conjuncture widely viewed as post-Marxist , discussing the relationship between theory and affect, and the role that affective infrastructures play in maintaining and reproducing social movements and political organisations. Drawing on Moten and Harney, I frame this intellectual labor as a form of dissonant , disorganized study - a mode of preparing for revolution by being together in brokenness and routinely generating a commitment to a particular political horizon. This form of political praxis as study unfolded within a Lebanese activist scene dominated by a pragmatic conception of politics, within which the critical labor of the radical and revolutionary left was largely considered sterile , mired in something akin to what Berlant calls cruel optimism. Drawing on Munoz, his conceptualisation of the politics of queer utopia, and his defence of utopian imaginativeness, I argue that for radical and revolutionary leftists in counter-revolutionary times, cultivating solidarity and camaraderie by maintaining a space of study that could enable technologies of both self and collective constituted a productive political act.
在贝鲁特读马克思:混乱的研究和酷儿乌托邦的政治
本文借鉴了黎巴嫩革命社会主义组织管理的马克思主义阅读小组进行的民族志研究。我考察了马克思主义理论实践在被广泛视为后马克思主义的政治环境中所做的工作,讨论了理论与情感之间的关系,以及情感基础设施在维持和再现社会运动和政治组织中所起的作用。以莫滕和哈尼为例,我将这种智力劳动定义为一种不和谐、无组织的学习形式——一种通过在破碎的环境中团结在一起,并经常对特定的政治领域做出承诺来为革命做准备的模式。这种形式的政治实践研究是在黎巴嫩活动家的场景中展开的,该场景由务实的政治概念主导,在这个场景中,激进和革命左派的批判劳动在很大程度上被认为是徒劳的,陷入了类似于Berlant所说的残酷乐观主义的境地。借鉴穆尼奥斯,他对酷儿乌托邦政治的概念化,以及他对乌托邦想象力的辩护,我认为,对于反革命时代的激进和革命左派来说,通过保持一个可以使自我和集体技术成为可能的研究空间来培养团结和同志情谊,是一种富有成效的政治行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信