Effect of Cultivar and Planting Date on Soybean Response to Dicamba

IF 1.5 Q2 AGRONOMY
Wesley France, J. Norsworthy, T. Roberts, J. Ross, T. Barber, E. Gbur
{"title":"Effect of Cultivar and Planting Date on Soybean Response to Dicamba","authors":"Wesley France, J. Norsworthy, T. Roberts, J. Ross, T. Barber, E. Gbur","doi":"10.1155/2022/9479650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Off-target movement of dicamba has been blamed for damaging millions of hectares of soybean in the United States since registration of the herbicide for use in dicamba-resistant cotton and soybean. Understanding the effect of a low dose of dicamba on non-dicamba-resistant soybean across multiple cultivars, growth stages, and planting dates could help producers better understand the implication of current management practices on yield loss from dicamba in fields where non-dicamba-resistant soybean are grown. A field experiment was conducted in 2019 in Fayetteville and Stuttgart, Arkansas, to evaluate the impact of planting date on response of soybean to a low dose of dicamba. The hypothesis of the planting date experiment was that soybean injury and yield loss will differ depending on planting date and dicamba application timing. Additionally, an experiment was conducted in 2018 and 2019 in Fayetteville to assess whether cultivars differ in sensitivity to dicamba. The hypothesis of the cultivar experiment was that genetic differences of soybean cultivars will allow for differential tolerance to dicamba. In the cultivar experiment, “Eagle DrewSoy” was identified as having enhanced tolerance to dicamba based on reduced injury (47% at R1 and 26% at V3) over both experimental years and locations. Soybean height in this experiment was affected only by application timing. In the planting date experiment, planting after mid-June resulted in reduced yields from dicamba injury. Dicamba exposure reduced yield at the July planting date (61% reduction from nontreated) more severely when compared to dicamba-treated plots of other planting dates (94% average relative yield among other planting dates), indicating that the negative effects of dicamba are increasingly deleterious for soybean planted later in the growing season. Maximum injury manifestation was generally delayed at later planting dates, indicating that dicamba may have been metabolized more slowly.","PeriodicalId":13844,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agronomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9479650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Off-target movement of dicamba has been blamed for damaging millions of hectares of soybean in the United States since registration of the herbicide for use in dicamba-resistant cotton and soybean. Understanding the effect of a low dose of dicamba on non-dicamba-resistant soybean across multiple cultivars, growth stages, and planting dates could help producers better understand the implication of current management practices on yield loss from dicamba in fields where non-dicamba-resistant soybean are grown. A field experiment was conducted in 2019 in Fayetteville and Stuttgart, Arkansas, to evaluate the impact of planting date on response of soybean to a low dose of dicamba. The hypothesis of the planting date experiment was that soybean injury and yield loss will differ depending on planting date and dicamba application timing. Additionally, an experiment was conducted in 2018 and 2019 in Fayetteville to assess whether cultivars differ in sensitivity to dicamba. The hypothesis of the cultivar experiment was that genetic differences of soybean cultivars will allow for differential tolerance to dicamba. In the cultivar experiment, “Eagle DrewSoy” was identified as having enhanced tolerance to dicamba based on reduced injury (47% at R1 and 26% at V3) over both experimental years and locations. Soybean height in this experiment was affected only by application timing. In the planting date experiment, planting after mid-June resulted in reduced yields from dicamba injury. Dicamba exposure reduced yield at the July planting date (61% reduction from nontreated) more severely when compared to dicamba-treated plots of other planting dates (94% average relative yield among other planting dates), indicating that the negative effects of dicamba are increasingly deleterious for soybean planted later in the growing season. Maximum injury manifestation was generally delayed at later planting dates, indicating that dicamba may have been metabolized more slowly.
品种和种植日期对大豆对麦草畏反应的影响
自从麦草畏注册用于抗麦草畏的棉花和大豆以来,麦草畏的脱靶运动被指责破坏了美国数百万公顷的大豆。了解低剂量麦草畏对不同品种、生长阶段和种植日期的非麦草畏抗性大豆的影响,可以帮助生产者更好地了解在种植非麦草畏抗性大豆的田地中,目前的管理措施对麦草畏造成的产量损失的影响。2019年,在阿肯色州费耶特维尔和斯图加特进行了一项田间试验,以评估播种日期对大豆对低剂量麦草畏反应的影响。播期试验的假设是大豆的危害和产量损失随播期和麦草畏施用时间的不同而不同。此外,2018年和2019年在费耶特维尔进行了一项实验,以评估不同品种对麦草畏的敏感性是否存在差异。品种试验的假设是,大豆品种的遗传差异将导致对麦草畏的不同耐受性。在品种试验中,在试验年份和试验地点,“Eagle DrewSoy”对麦草畏的耐受性增强,其伤害减少了(R1为47%,V3为26%)。本试验大豆株高仅受施肥期的影响。在播种日期试验中,6月中旬以后播种导致麦草畏害产量下降。与麦草畏处理过的其他播种日期相比,7月播种日期麦草畏暴露对产量的降低(与未处理相比减少61%)更为严重(与其他播种日期相比平均相对产量减少94%),这表明麦草畏的负面影响对生长季节后期种植的大豆越来越有害。最大伤害表现通常延迟到较晚的种植日期,这表明麦草畏可能代谢较慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信