Multimodal literacy and language testing: Visual and intersemiotic literacy indicators of reading comprehension texts

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Styliani Karatza
{"title":"Multimodal literacy and language testing: Visual and intersemiotic literacy indicators of reading comprehension texts","authors":"Styliani Karatza","doi":"10.1080/1051144X.2020.1826222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is concerned with multimodal literacy involving the different kinds of knowledge required to fully access texts with multiple semiotic resources used in reading comprehension test tasks. Such literacy requirements have not drawn researchers’ attention to date, mainly because the foreign language teaching and testing project has primarily focussed on the verbal features of reading comprehension texts. Drawing on data from the Greek National Foreign Language Exams (known with the acronym KPG) – one of the few high-stakes examination systems which use multimodal reading comprehension texts – the paper approaches reading comprehension as a meaning-making process highly dependent on both image and language used in test tasks and the relations between them (i.e. intersemiosis). Working mainly within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), this study has attempted a systematic description of the visual and intersemiotic literacy indicators of 86 multimodal media texts used in KPG reading comprehension test tasks. For the SFL-oriented multimodal discourse analysis, Tan et al.’s categories of system choices suggested for the analysis of different types of multimodal media texts, and the Multimodal Analysis Image (MMA) interactive software program were used.","PeriodicalId":36535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Literacy","volume":"39 1","pages":"220 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1051144X.2020.1826222","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2020.1826222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper is concerned with multimodal literacy involving the different kinds of knowledge required to fully access texts with multiple semiotic resources used in reading comprehension test tasks. Such literacy requirements have not drawn researchers’ attention to date, mainly because the foreign language teaching and testing project has primarily focussed on the verbal features of reading comprehension texts. Drawing on data from the Greek National Foreign Language Exams (known with the acronym KPG) – one of the few high-stakes examination systems which use multimodal reading comprehension texts – the paper approaches reading comprehension as a meaning-making process highly dependent on both image and language used in test tasks and the relations between them (i.e. intersemiosis). Working mainly within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), this study has attempted a systematic description of the visual and intersemiotic literacy indicators of 86 multimodal media texts used in KPG reading comprehension test tasks. For the SFL-oriented multimodal discourse analysis, Tan et al.’s categories of system choices suggested for the analysis of different types of multimodal media texts, and the Multimodal Analysis Image (MMA) interactive software program were used.
多模式识字和语言测试:阅读理解文本的视觉和跨文化识字指标
摘要:本文研究阅读理解测试任务中,多模态读写能力涉及不同类型的知识,这些知识是完全理解具有多种符号资源的文本所必需的。这种读写能力要求至今尚未引起研究者的注意,主要是因为外语教学和测试项目主要关注阅读理解文本的言语特征。根据希腊国家外语考试(简称KPG)的数据——这是少数几个使用多模态阅读理解文本的高风险考试系统之一——本文将阅读理解视为一个高度依赖于测试任务中使用的图像和语言以及它们之间的关系(即间义关系)的意义生成过程。本研究主要在系统功能语言学(SFL)的框架内,对KPG阅读理解测试任务中86个多模态媒体文本的视觉和符号间素养指标进行了系统描述。对于面向sfl的多模态语篇分析,我们使用了Tan等人提出的用于分析不同类型多模态媒体文本的系统选择类别,并使用了多模态分析图像(multimodal analysis Image, MMA)交互式软件程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Literacy
Journal of Visual Literacy Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信