CARBON FOOTPRINT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING AND PROMISING THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Q3 Engineering
N. Rogalev
{"title":"CARBON FOOTPRINT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING AND PROMISING THERMAL POWER PLANTS","authors":"N. Rogalev","doi":"10.31489/2022no4/34-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The power production industry is the main greenhouse gas emitter that makes its contribution to global warming. The greenhouse gas emission takes place in fuel production, transportation, and combustion. A prospective method for emission mitigation is the transition to organic fuel-burning facilities with small emissions by capturing carbon dioxide. Power consumption on the carbon dioxide capture remarkably reduces the efficiency of these facilities, which leads to increasing of fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emission because of the larger fuel production and transportation. Based on the material balance method, taking into account system effect of changes in efficiency and amount of fuel consumed, the paper estimated the carbon footprint over a twenty-year lifecycle for following thermal power plants types: combined cycle and oxy-fuel combustion plants for both natural gas and coal with internal gasification. It is shown that the transition to oxygen-fuel plants can reduce the carbon footprint near 90% for natural gas and near 75% for coal. The study also demonstrates the positive effect of carbon capture and storage system implementation for reducing carbon footprint near 75% for natural gas and near 70% for coal.","PeriodicalId":11789,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Physical Technical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Physical Technical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31489/2022no4/34-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The power production industry is the main greenhouse gas emitter that makes its contribution to global warming. The greenhouse gas emission takes place in fuel production, transportation, and combustion. A prospective method for emission mitigation is the transition to organic fuel-burning facilities with small emissions by capturing carbon dioxide. Power consumption on the carbon dioxide capture remarkably reduces the efficiency of these facilities, which leads to increasing of fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emission because of the larger fuel production and transportation. Based on the material balance method, taking into account system effect of changes in efficiency and amount of fuel consumed, the paper estimated the carbon footprint over a twenty-year lifecycle for following thermal power plants types: combined cycle and oxy-fuel combustion plants for both natural gas and coal with internal gasification. It is shown that the transition to oxygen-fuel plants can reduce the carbon footprint near 90% for natural gas and near 75% for coal. The study also demonstrates the positive effect of carbon capture and storage system implementation for reducing carbon footprint near 75% for natural gas and near 70% for coal.
现有和有前景的火力发电厂碳足迹比较分析
电力生产行业是造成全球变暖的主要温室气体排放国。温室气体排放发生在燃料生产、运输和燃烧过程中。一种有前景的减排方法是通过捕获二氧化碳向排放量小的有机燃料燃烧设施过渡。二氧化碳捕获的电力消耗显著降低了这些设施的效率,由于燃料生产和运输量较大,导致燃料消耗和温室气体排放增加。基于材料平衡法,考虑到效率和燃料消耗量变化的系统效应,本文估计了以下类型的火力发电厂在20年生命周期内的碳足迹:天然气和煤的联合循环和氧燃料燃烧厂,以及内部气化。研究表明,向氧气燃料工厂的过渡可以将天然气的碳足迹减少近90%,将煤炭的碳足迹降低近75%。该研究还证明了碳捕获和储存系统的实施对减少天然气近75%的碳足迹和煤炭近70%的碳足迹的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信