Development of Teachers’ Structural Empowerment Scale (TSES): A Validity and Reliability Study

Elif Iliman Puskulluoglu, Yahya Altınkurt
{"title":"Development of Teachers’ Structural Empowerment Scale (TSES): A Validity and Reliability Study","authors":"Elif Iliman Puskulluoglu, Yahya Altınkurt","doi":"10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2017.61.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to develop a data collection tool in order to define the levels of teachers’ structural empowerment. The sample of the research consists of teachers of primary, secondary and high schools. For the construct validity, explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses are done. The five-factor structure, emerged as the result of explanatory factor analysis (EFA), is; Participatory DecisionMaking Environment (DM), Accountable Environment (AE), Professional Development Supportive Environment (PD), Facilitative School Environment (FE), and AutonomySupportive Environment (AS). This five-factor structure accounts for 65.01% of the total variance. The scale is comprised of a five-point Likert type 30 items ranging from “1-completely disagree” to “5-completely agree”. The five-factor, 30 item structure emerged at the end of EFA, is also analyzed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the results show that the scale has good fit (χ/sd= 2.93, RMSEA= .079, NFI= .96, NNFI= .97, CFI= .97, IFI= .97, RMR= .04, SRMR= .05). For the reliability of the scale, item total correlations, Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficients and item means of the upper and lower 27% groups are examined. Consequently, a psychometrically adequate, valid and reliable data collection tool is developed to assess teachers’ structural empowerment.","PeriodicalId":31152,"journal":{"name":"Universitepark Bulten","volume":"6 1","pages":"118-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitepark Bulten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2017.61.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a data collection tool in order to define the levels of teachers’ structural empowerment. The sample of the research consists of teachers of primary, secondary and high schools. For the construct validity, explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses are done. The five-factor structure, emerged as the result of explanatory factor analysis (EFA), is; Participatory DecisionMaking Environment (DM), Accountable Environment (AE), Professional Development Supportive Environment (PD), Facilitative School Environment (FE), and AutonomySupportive Environment (AS). This five-factor structure accounts for 65.01% of the total variance. The scale is comprised of a five-point Likert type 30 items ranging from “1-completely disagree” to “5-completely agree”. The five-factor, 30 item structure emerged at the end of EFA, is also analyzed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the results show that the scale has good fit (χ/sd= 2.93, RMSEA= .079, NFI= .96, NNFI= .97, CFI= .97, IFI= .97, RMR= .04, SRMR= .05). For the reliability of the scale, item total correlations, Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficients and item means of the upper and lower 27% groups are examined. Consequently, a psychometrically adequate, valid and reliable data collection tool is developed to assess teachers’ structural empowerment.
教师结构授权量表的编制:效度与信度研究
本研究的目的是开发一种数据收集工具,以确定教师结构赋权的水平。研究样本包括小学、中学和高中的教师。对构念有效性进行了解释性和验证性因素分析。作为解释性因素分析(EFA)的结果出现的五因素结构是:;参与决策环境(DM)、责任环境(AE)、专业发展支持环境(PD)、便利学校环境(FE)和自主支持环境(AS)。这种五因素结构占总方差的65.01%。该量表由五点Likert类型的30个项目组成,从“1-完全不同意”到“5-完全同意”。通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对全民教育结束时出现的五因素30项结构进行了分析,结果表明该量表具有良好的拟合性(χ/sd=2.93,RMSEA=0.079,NFI=0.96,NNFI=0.97,CFI=0.97,IFI=.97,RMR=.04,SRMR=0.05),检验了上27%组和下27%组的Cronbach’s Alpha内部一致性系数和项目均值。因此,开发了一种心理测量学上充分、有效和可靠的数据收集工具来评估教师的结构性赋权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信