DISCURSIVE STRATEGIES IN THE KEYNES-HAYEK DEBATE: BUILDING A LIBERAL CRITIQUE

Q3 Social Sciences

Contributions to Political Economy Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1093/CPE/BZZ014

D. Guizzo

引用次数: 4

Abstract

© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved. This article addresses an analysis of discourse based on Michel Foucault's 'order of discourse' to comprehend which discursive forces influenced Keynes's mode of thought and his liberal critique. The article returns to the Keynes-Hayek debate to explore the possibilities of considering Hayek as a reverse influence in Keynes's late beliefs on the limits of state action and socially desired ends. An understanding of Keynes's view on the state and economic action requires identifying the underlying strategies of his discourse when criticizing Hayek's spontaneous liberalism. More specifically, Hayek's liberal views promoted a reverse and discontinuous force that contributed to reinforce Keynes's mode of thought.

查看原文本刊更多论文

凯恩斯辩论中的话语策略：构建自由主义批判

©2019作者。牛津大学出版社代表剑桥政治经济学会出版。保留所有权利。本文基于米歇尔·福柯的“话语秩序”对话语进行了分析，以理解是哪些话语力量影响了凯恩斯的思维模式及其自由主义批判。文章回到凯恩斯-哈耶克的辩论，探讨将哈耶克视为凯恩斯晚期对国家行动和社会期望目的的极限信念的反向影响的可能性。要理解凯恩斯关于国家和经济行动的观点，就需要在批评哈耶克自发的自由主义时确定其话语的潜在策略。更具体地说，哈耶克的自由主义观点促进了一种反向和不连续的力量，有助于强化凯恩斯的思维模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Contributions to Political Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.