{"title":"Forging an Alternative to Separate Development: Afrikaner Sociology, the Apartheid State, and the ‘Coloured’ Question (c.1932–1984)","authors":"Janeke Thumbran","doi":"10.1080/02582473.2022.2055130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article makes an intervention into the historiography which has positioned Afrikaner sociology as an unambiguous instrument of the apartheid state. In doing so, the article examines how leading Afrikaner sociologists used Parsonian structural functionalism to engage with the coloured question in the 1970s – articulated as the conundrum of where to position coloureds politically in the absence of direct representation in parliament. The primary argument is that this form of differentiated knowledge production was ‘alternative’ in the context of Afrikaner sociology’s early ties to Afrikaner nationalism because it challenged Verwoerdian separate development and replaced it with the idea that coloureds shared ‘common values’ with white society. This argument is made by tracing how Afrikaner sociologists’ calls for coloured representation gained momentum in the early 1970s, initiating a set of reforms which may be viewed as a resolution to the coloured question through the establishment of the Tricameral Parliament in 1984.","PeriodicalId":45116,"journal":{"name":"South African Historical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Historical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02582473.2022.2055130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article makes an intervention into the historiography which has positioned Afrikaner sociology as an unambiguous instrument of the apartheid state. In doing so, the article examines how leading Afrikaner sociologists used Parsonian structural functionalism to engage with the coloured question in the 1970s – articulated as the conundrum of where to position coloureds politically in the absence of direct representation in parliament. The primary argument is that this form of differentiated knowledge production was ‘alternative’ in the context of Afrikaner sociology’s early ties to Afrikaner nationalism because it challenged Verwoerdian separate development and replaced it with the idea that coloureds shared ‘common values’ with white society. This argument is made by tracing how Afrikaner sociologists’ calls for coloured representation gained momentum in the early 1970s, initiating a set of reforms which may be viewed as a resolution to the coloured question through the establishment of the Tricameral Parliament in 1984.
期刊介绍:
Over the past 40 years, the South African Historical Journal has become renowned and internationally regarded as a premier history journal published in South Africa, promoting significant historical scholarship on the country as well as the southern African region. The journal, which is linked to the Southern African Historical Society, has provided a high-quality medium for original thinking about South African history and has thus shaped - and continues to contribute towards defining - the historiography of the region.