Challenges of Maturity Models in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the Post-COVID-19 Era

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Yusuf Umar Datti, N. Zawawi, A. A. Umar, M. Sutanto, K. U. Danyaro
{"title":"Challenges of Maturity Models in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the Post-COVID-19 Era","authors":"Yusuf Umar Datti, N. Zawawi, A. A. Umar, M. Sutanto, K. U. Danyaro","doi":"10.32738/jeppm-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maturity models (MMs) have witnessed exponential increase due to their successful application in several domains. However, there is an absence of review that guides researchers in developing, applying and validating Public-Private Partnership maturity models (PPPMMs). This study examines PPPMMs, provides guidance on the topic and highlights gaps in the literature. A literature search on selected electronic databases was conducted, and the study adopted the widely accepted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement (PRISMA). The study identified a total of four thousand six hundred and eighteen (4,618) studies, and twenty-one studies (21Nr) were rigorously selected. The results revealed PPPMMs as an emerging area of research with a low number – 21 publications since its deployment for about two (2) decades. Similarly, the findings unveiled a lack of uniformity in conceptualising the terms, dimensions used, and methodology adopted. This finding is attributed mainly to the limited use of the theoretical lens, which considerably weakens the model’s theoretical foundation and limits its potential to guide improvement. Additionally, there are more efforts in developing MMs than applying and validating them. Furthermore, there is an unbalanced focus on descriptive models over prescriptive and comparative models, which inhibit the model’s potential to guide improvement. Future work should provide a solid ground to the field using a theoretical lens and focus on prescriptive models with a strong emphasis on application and validation. This research is the first of its kind that synthesises and brings together available PPPMMs literature into one place. It also contributes to the body of knowledge by highlighting areas of research that require immediate attention to enhance the much-needed success of PPP in the post-COVID-19 era.","PeriodicalId":53274,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32738/jeppm-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maturity models (MMs) have witnessed exponential increase due to their successful application in several domains. However, there is an absence of review that guides researchers in developing, applying and validating Public-Private Partnership maturity models (PPPMMs). This study examines PPPMMs, provides guidance on the topic and highlights gaps in the literature. A literature search on selected electronic databases was conducted, and the study adopted the widely accepted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement (PRISMA). The study identified a total of four thousand six hundred and eighteen (4,618) studies, and twenty-one studies (21Nr) were rigorously selected. The results revealed PPPMMs as an emerging area of research with a low number – 21 publications since its deployment for about two (2) decades. Similarly, the findings unveiled a lack of uniformity in conceptualising the terms, dimensions used, and methodology adopted. This finding is attributed mainly to the limited use of the theoretical lens, which considerably weakens the model’s theoretical foundation and limits its potential to guide improvement. Additionally, there are more efforts in developing MMs than applying and validating them. Furthermore, there is an unbalanced focus on descriptive models over prescriptive and comparative models, which inhibit the model’s potential to guide improvement. Future work should provide a solid ground to the field using a theoretical lens and focus on prescriptive models with a strong emphasis on application and validation. This research is the first of its kind that synthesises and brings together available PPPMMs literature into one place. It also contributes to the body of knowledge by highlighting areas of research that require immediate attention to enhance the much-needed success of PPP in the post-COVID-19 era.
后COVID-19时代公私伙伴关系(PPP)成熟度模型的挑战
成熟度模型(MM)由于在几个领域的成功应用,已经见证了指数级的增长。然而,缺乏指导研究人员开发、应用和验证公私合作成熟度模型(PPPMM)的审查。这项研究考察了PPPMM,提供了关于该主题的指导,并强调了文献中的空白。对选定的电子数据库进行了文献检索,研究采用了广泛接受的系统评价和荟萃分析声明首选报告项目(PRISMA)。该研究共确定了四千六百一十八(4618)项研究,并严格选择了21项研究(21Nr)。研究结果显示,PPPMM是一个新兴的研究领域,自部署约二十(2)年以来,其出版物数量较低,为21篇。同样,研究结果表明,在概念化术语、使用的维度和采用的方法方面缺乏一致性。这一发现主要归因于理论透镜的有限使用,这大大削弱了模型的理论基础,并限制了其指导改进的潜力。此外,在开发MM方面要比应用和验证MM付出更多的努力。此外,与规定性和比较性模型相比,对描述性模型的关注不平衡,这抑制了模型指导改进的潜力。未来的工作应使用理论视角为该领域提供坚实的基础,并侧重于规范性模型,重点强调应用和验证。这项研究是第一项将现有的PPPMM文献综合在一起的研究。它还通过强调需要立即关注的研究领域来促进PPP在后COVID-19时代取得急需的成功,从而为知识体系做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management
Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信