Characterization of partnerships and collaborations in US cities' urban resilience plans

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
L. Caughman
{"title":"Characterization of partnerships and collaborations in US cities' urban resilience plans","authors":"L. Caughman","doi":"10.1108/rausp-09-2021-0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) number 13 calls for urgent action to combat climate change impacts. Urban resilience planning documents often articulate partnerships and collaborations (P&Cs) as critical strategies. This study aims to identify the actors, the topics, processes, and visions of collaboration.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper explores the characterization of urban resilience partnerships via a thematic content analysis of resilience strategy documents produced in US cities through the 100 Resilient Cities Project.\n\n\nFindings\nP&Cs are defined broadly, taking several forms to meet various objectives. They act as boundary objects engaging across social groups, but the details of the P&Cs are rarely articulated, which is problematic for their implementation. P&Cs are commonly discussed in relation to the focus of the work; therefore, they less often define the specific actors, processes or transformative visions involved.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research focuses only on the resilience plans written in US cities, showing the perspective of US policymakers. Documents analyzed were produced via the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities Project.\n\n\nPractical implications\nUnderstanding and categorizing the who, what, when and why of P&Cs for urban resilience provide a deeper understanding of how these strategies are being described and offer a starting point for tangibly actualizing partnerships and collaborations outside planning documents.\n\n\nSocial implications\nTo reach vital urban resilience goals, P&Cs must be designed and managed appropriately. Understanding the shortcoming of current P&C policies can help managers mitigate problems and find better approaches.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first to analyze how P&Cs are being articulated and described in urban resilience plans. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal number 13 calls for urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. As urbanization continues and the effects of climate change escalate, city governments are finding themselves responsible for the resilience of large populations. To cope, increasing numbers of municipalities are developing urban resilience plans. These documents often articulate partnerships and collaborations (P&Cs) as critical strategies for enhancing resilience capacity and implementing resilience policies. Although specific case studies of resilience-related collaborative practices are well documented in urban resilience literature, little is known about the proliferation of P&C strategies collectively. Furthermore, questions remain regarding the characterization of resilience P&Cs by practitioners, including who is involved and what types of projects they undertake. Therefore, this analysis explores urban resilience P&Cs via a thematic content analysis of resilience strategy documents produced in 16 US cities through the 100 Resilient Cities Project. Results indicate that cities prioritize P&Cs in resilience policy implementation, but they often fall short in defining the key components of P&Cs that are vital to their success. The analysis exposes the most common actors, topics, processes and visions described in resilience P&Cs and makes recommendations for how urban resilience P&Cs can be improved in the future.\n","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-09-2021-0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) number 13 calls for urgent action to combat climate change impacts. Urban resilience planning documents often articulate partnerships and collaborations (P&Cs) as critical strategies. This study aims to identify the actors, the topics, processes, and visions of collaboration. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the characterization of urban resilience partnerships via a thematic content analysis of resilience strategy documents produced in US cities through the 100 Resilient Cities Project. Findings P&Cs are defined broadly, taking several forms to meet various objectives. They act as boundary objects engaging across social groups, but the details of the P&Cs are rarely articulated, which is problematic for their implementation. P&Cs are commonly discussed in relation to the focus of the work; therefore, they less often define the specific actors, processes or transformative visions involved. Research limitations/implications This research focuses only on the resilience plans written in US cities, showing the perspective of US policymakers. Documents analyzed were produced via the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities Project. Practical implications Understanding and categorizing the who, what, when and why of P&Cs for urban resilience provide a deeper understanding of how these strategies are being described and offer a starting point for tangibly actualizing partnerships and collaborations outside planning documents. Social implications To reach vital urban resilience goals, P&Cs must be designed and managed appropriately. Understanding the shortcoming of current P&C policies can help managers mitigate problems and find better approaches. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first to analyze how P&Cs are being articulated and described in urban resilience plans. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal number 13 calls for urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. As urbanization continues and the effects of climate change escalate, city governments are finding themselves responsible for the resilience of large populations. To cope, increasing numbers of municipalities are developing urban resilience plans. These documents often articulate partnerships and collaborations (P&Cs) as critical strategies for enhancing resilience capacity and implementing resilience policies. Although specific case studies of resilience-related collaborative practices are well documented in urban resilience literature, little is known about the proliferation of P&C strategies collectively. Furthermore, questions remain regarding the characterization of resilience P&Cs by practitioners, including who is involved and what types of projects they undertake. Therefore, this analysis explores urban resilience P&Cs via a thematic content analysis of resilience strategy documents produced in 16 US cities through the 100 Resilient Cities Project. Results indicate that cities prioritize P&Cs in resilience policy implementation, but they often fall short in defining the key components of P&Cs that are vital to their success. The analysis exposes the most common actors, topics, processes and visions described in resilience P&Cs and makes recommendations for how urban resilience P&Cs can be improved in the future.
美国城市恢复力计划中伙伴关系和合作的特征
目的联合国可持续发展目标第13号呼吁采取紧急行动应对气候变化的影响。城市复原力规划文件通常将伙伴关系和合作(P&Cs)列为关键战略。本研究旨在确定合作的参与者、主题、过程和愿景。设计/方法论/方法本文通过对美国城市通过100个韧性城市项目编制的韧性战略文件的主题内容分析,探讨了城市韧性伙伴关系的特征。发现的P&C定义广泛,采取多种形式来实现各种目标。它们充当着跨社会群体参与的边界对象,但P&C的细节很少被阐明,这对其实施来说是有问题的。P&C通常与工作重点有关;因此,它们很少定义所涉及的具体参与者、过程或变革愿景。研究局限性/含义本研究仅关注美国城市制定的恢复力计划,展示了美国政策制定者的观点。所分析的文件是通过洛克菲勒基金会的100个韧性城市项目编制的。实际含义了解和分类城市韧性P&C的人员、内容、时间和原因,可以更深入地了解如何描述这些战略,并为切实实施规划文件外的伙伴关系和合作提供起点。社会影响为了实现重要的城市恢复力目标,必须适当设计和管理P&C。了解当前P&C政策的不足可以帮助管理者缓解问题并找到更好的方法。独创性/价值据作者所知,本文首次分析了城市恢复力计划中如何阐明和描述P&C。联合国可持续发展目标第13号呼吁采取紧急行动应对气候变化及其影响。随着城市化的持续和气候变化的影响升级,城市政府发现自己要为大量人口的恢复能力负责。为了应对这种情况,越来越多的市政当局正在制定城市复原计划。这些文件通常将伙伴关系和合作(P&Cs)列为提高复原能力和实施复原政策的关键战略。尽管与恢复力相关的合作实践的具体案例研究在城市恢复力文献中有很好的记录,但对P&C战略的集体扩散知之甚少。此外,从业者对韧性P&C的描述仍然存在问题,包括谁参与以及他们承担的项目类型。因此,本分析通过对通过100个韧性城市项目在美国16个城市编制的韧性战略文件进行主题内容分析,探讨了城市韧性P&C。结果表明,城市在恢复力政策实施中优先考虑P&C,但它们在定义对其成功至关重要的P&C关键组成部分方面往往不足。该分析揭示了韧性P&C中描述的最常见的参与者、主题、过程和愿景,并就未来如何改善城市韧性P&C提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信