Beethoven and Neefe—A Reappraisal

IF 0.3 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
MUSIC & LETTERS Pub Date : 2021-02-24 DOI:10.1093/ML/GCAA087
J. V. D. Zanden
{"title":"Beethoven and Neefe—A Reappraisal","authors":"J. V. D. Zanden","doi":"10.1093/ML/GCAA087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Deeply entrenched in Beethoven biography is the view that Christian Gottlob Neefe was the composer’s most important teacher in Bonn and that Beethoven was grateful to him. Critical writing has always vaunted Neefe’s merits in lavish terms, in sharp contradiction to the recollection of a contemporary in Bonn, his friend Franz Wegeler, who downplayed Neefe’s significance. This essay investigates the primary sources with regard to the role of Neefe in an attempt to shed light on the discrepancy. Early biographical writing is scrutinized to investigate how these early sources were presented and interpreted. Decisive were the views of Alexander Wheelock Thayer, whose authoritative biography set the standard for decades. A contextualization of Neefe’s role in musical Bonn and his leadership of the Illuminati (a branch of freemasonry), together with information on Beethoven’s trip to Holland in 1783, leads to the conclusion that Neefe’s alleged importance is a nineteenth-century construction based on uncertain evidence. The cherished notion of a close affinity between teacher and pupil is debunked as a myth that would better not be perpetuated.","PeriodicalId":44448,"journal":{"name":"MUSIC & LETTERS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ML/GCAA087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSIC & LETTERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ML/GCAA087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deeply entrenched in Beethoven biography is the view that Christian Gottlob Neefe was the composer’s most important teacher in Bonn and that Beethoven was grateful to him. Critical writing has always vaunted Neefe’s merits in lavish terms, in sharp contradiction to the recollection of a contemporary in Bonn, his friend Franz Wegeler, who downplayed Neefe’s significance. This essay investigates the primary sources with regard to the role of Neefe in an attempt to shed light on the discrepancy. Early biographical writing is scrutinized to investigate how these early sources were presented and interpreted. Decisive were the views of Alexander Wheelock Thayer, whose authoritative biography set the standard for decades. A contextualization of Neefe’s role in musical Bonn and his leadership of the Illuminati (a branch of freemasonry), together with information on Beethoven’s trip to Holland in 1783, leads to the conclusion that Neefe’s alleged importance is a nineteenth-century construction based on uncertain evidence. The cherished notion of a close affinity between teacher and pupil is debunked as a myth that would better not be perpetuated.
贝多芬与尼夫——再评价
在贝多芬的传记中,根深蒂固的观点是,克里斯蒂安·戈特洛布·尼菲是贝多芬在波恩最重要的老师,贝多芬很感激他。评论性写作总是用华丽的语言来夸耀尼菲的功绩,这与他在波恩的朋友弗朗茨·维格勒(Franz Wegeler)的回忆形成鲜明对比,后者淡化了尼菲的重要性。本文调查了关于Neefe角色的主要来源,试图阐明这种差异。早期的传记写作被仔细审查,以调查这些早期的来源是如何呈现和解释的。亚历山大·惠洛克·塞耶(Alexander Wheelock Thayer)的观点是决定性的,他的权威传记奠定了几十年来的标准。把尼菲在音乐剧《波恩》中的角色和他在光明会(共济会的一个分支)中的领导地位放在一个背景下,再加上贝多芬1783年去荷兰旅行的信息,我们得出结论,尼菲所谓的重要性是基于不确定证据的19世纪建筑。师生之间亲密关系的珍贵观念被揭穿为一个神话,最好不要延续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信