Preparing Youth with Disabilities for College: How Research Can Inform Transition Policy

Michael G. Wilson, A. Hoffman, M. Mclaughlin
{"title":"Preparing Youth with Disabilities for College: How Research Can Inform Transition Policy","authors":"Michael G. Wilson, A. Hoffman, M. Mclaughlin","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V41I7.6839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Special education policy as articulated through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) focuses on improving the postschool outcomes of students with disabilities, including enrollment in college. The transition requirements of the 2004 IDEA amendments (P.L. 108-446) require school systems to determine postschool goals for youth with disabilities and to provide individualized transition services to enable them to reach those goals. College enrollment and access have recently become an important postsecondary outcome measure for students with disabilities (Horn, Berktold, & Bobbitt, 1999). However, programming, transition services, and research have historically centered on increasing skills (e.g., self-determination, parental support, work-based learning) associated with independent living and postschool employability rather than with college enrollment (Bremer, Kachgal, & Schoeller, 2003; Leucking & Mooney, 2002; Roy & Casper, 2006). This focus has been justified by the dismal employment outcomes for many youth with disabilities, specifically those with moderate to severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Notwithstanding, in recent years legislation has increasingly focused on promoting enrollment in twoand four-year colleges as a means of improving employment outcomes for all students with disabilities. The 1997 and 2004 amendments to IDEA included several new provisions that place a greater emphasis on ensuring youth with disabilities access to the general education curriculum and inclusion in state accountability programs. In addition, changes to transition provisions in the law require greater focus on developing a course of study for secondary students with disabilities that will lead to , desired outcomes, such as college enrollment. Despite these efforts, relatively little research has been conducted to inform practice related· to transition services leading to college enrollment.","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V41I7.6839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Special education policy as articulated through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) focuses on improving the postschool outcomes of students with disabilities, including enrollment in college. The transition requirements of the 2004 IDEA amendments (P.L. 108-446) require school systems to determine postschool goals for youth with disabilities and to provide individualized transition services to enable them to reach those goals. College enrollment and access have recently become an important postsecondary outcome measure for students with disabilities (Horn, Berktold, & Bobbitt, 1999). However, programming, transition services, and research have historically centered on increasing skills (e.g., self-determination, parental support, work-based learning) associated with independent living and postschool employability rather than with college enrollment (Bremer, Kachgal, & Schoeller, 2003; Leucking & Mooney, 2002; Roy & Casper, 2006). This focus has been justified by the dismal employment outcomes for many youth with disabilities, specifically those with moderate to severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Notwithstanding, in recent years legislation has increasingly focused on promoting enrollment in twoand four-year colleges as a means of improving employment outcomes for all students with disabilities. The 1997 and 2004 amendments to IDEA included several new provisions that place a greater emphasis on ensuring youth with disabilities access to the general education curriculum and inclusion in state accountability programs. In addition, changes to transition provisions in the law require greater focus on developing a course of study for secondary students with disabilities that will lead to , desired outcomes, such as college enrollment. Despite these efforts, relatively little research has been conducted to inform practice related· to transition services leading to college enrollment.
为残疾青年上大学做准备:研究如何为过渡政策提供信息
《残疾人教育改善法》阐明的特殊教育政策侧重于改善残疾学生的放学后成绩,包括大学入学率。2004年IDEA修正案(P.L.108-446)的过渡要求要求学校系统确定残疾青年的放学后目标,并提供个性化的过渡服务,使他们能够实现这些目标。最近,大学入学率和入学率已成为衡量残疾学生中学后成绩的重要指标(Horn,Berktold,&Bobbitt,1999)。然而,从历史上看,编程、过渡服务和研究一直以提高与独立生活和毕业后就业能力相关的技能(如自决、父母支持、基于工作的学习)为中心,而不是与大学入学相关(Bremer、Kachgal和Schoeller,2003;Leucking和Mooney,2002年;Roy和Casper,2006年)。许多残疾青年,特别是中度至重度智力和发育残疾青年的就业结果不佳,证明了这种关注是合理的。尽管如此,近年来,立法越来越注重促进两年制和四年制大学的入学,以此作为改善所有残疾学生就业结果的一种手段。1997年和2004年对IDEA的修正案包括了几项新条款,更加强调确保残疾青年获得普通教育课程并纳入国家问责制计划。此外,法律中过渡条款的修改要求更多地关注为残疾中学生开发一门能够带来预期结果的学习课程,例如大学入学。尽管做出了这些努力,但为实现大学招生的实践相关·过渡服务提供信息的研究相对较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信