Perception and Evaluation of (Modified) Wood by Older Adults from Slovenia and Norway

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 FORESTRY
D. Lipovac, S. Wie, A. Nyrud, M. Burnard
{"title":"Perception and Evaluation of (Modified) Wood by Older Adults from Slovenia and Norway","authors":"D. Lipovac, S. Wie, A. Nyrud, M. Burnard","doi":"10.22382/wfs-2022-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Many building users prefer wood over other building materials, but it is unclear how modi fi ed wood is perceived compared with unmodi fi ed wood. Additionally, it is unclear which material properties play a role in the general preference for wood, how tactile and tactile – visual perceptions of materials affect user preference for wood, and whether human preference for wood is consistent across countries and cultures with different wood use practices. One hundred older adults from Slovenia and Norway rated and ranked wooden materials (ie handrails) made of either unmodi fi ed or modi fi ed wood and a stainless steel control sample. The materials were rated on a semantic differential scale (capturing sensory and affective attributes) by each participant twice: fi rst, while only touching the materials and then while simultaneously touching and seeing the materials. Finally, each participant ranked the handrails in order of preference. Wooden handrails were generally more preferred than the steel sample. Preference ratings and rankings of modi fi ed wood were comparable to those of unmodi fi ed wood. Results were relatively consistent across both countries. Materials rated as liked were perceived as somewhat less cold, less damp, more usual, less arti fi cial, more expensive, and less unpleasant. The ratings were fairly consistent between the tactile and tactile – visual tasks. In some indoor applications, certain types of modi fi ed wood could be used in place of unmodi fi ed wood while meeting human aesthetical preferences. Speci fi c visual and tactile properties can predict material preference and could be considered in the material design phase. The tactile experience is important in overall material perception and should not be overlooked. These fi ndings seem to be stable across countries with different wood use practices.","PeriodicalId":23620,"journal":{"name":"Wood and Fiber Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood and Fiber Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2022-05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. Many building users prefer wood over other building materials, but it is unclear how modi fi ed wood is perceived compared with unmodi fi ed wood. Additionally, it is unclear which material properties play a role in the general preference for wood, how tactile and tactile – visual perceptions of materials affect user preference for wood, and whether human preference for wood is consistent across countries and cultures with different wood use practices. One hundred older adults from Slovenia and Norway rated and ranked wooden materials (ie handrails) made of either unmodi fi ed or modi fi ed wood and a stainless steel control sample. The materials were rated on a semantic differential scale (capturing sensory and affective attributes) by each participant twice: fi rst, while only touching the materials and then while simultaneously touching and seeing the materials. Finally, each participant ranked the handrails in order of preference. Wooden handrails were generally more preferred than the steel sample. Preference ratings and rankings of modi fi ed wood were comparable to those of unmodi fi ed wood. Results were relatively consistent across both countries. Materials rated as liked were perceived as somewhat less cold, less damp, more usual, less arti fi cial, more expensive, and less unpleasant. The ratings were fairly consistent between the tactile and tactile – visual tasks. In some indoor applications, certain types of modi fi ed wood could be used in place of unmodi fi ed wood while meeting human aesthetical preferences. Speci fi c visual and tactile properties can predict material preference and could be considered in the material design phase. The tactile experience is important in overall material perception and should not be overlooked. These fi ndings seem to be stable across countries with different wood use practices.
斯洛文尼亚和挪威老年人对(改性)木材的感知和评价
许多建筑用户更喜欢木材而不是其他建筑材料,但目前尚不清楚改性木材与未改性木材相比如何看待。此外,目前尚不清楚哪些材料特性在人们对木材的普遍偏好中发挥作用,材料的触觉和触觉-视觉感知如何影响用户对木材的偏好,以及不同木材使用实践的国家和文化对木材的喜好是否一致。来自斯洛文尼亚和挪威的100名老年人对由未经改良或改造的木材和不锈钢对照样品制成的木质材料(即扶手)进行了评级和排序。每个参与者对材料进行两次语义差异评分(捕捉感官和情感属性):第一次,只触摸材料,然后同时触摸和看到材料。最后,每个参与者按照偏好的顺序对扶手进行排名。木制扶手通常比钢制扶手更受欢迎。改性木材的偏好评级和排名与未改性木材相当。两国的结果相对一致。被评为喜欢的材料被认为不那么冷,不那么潮湿,更普通,不那么做作,更昂贵,也不那么令人不快。触觉和触觉-视觉任务的评分相当一致。在一些室内应用中,某些类型的改良木材可以用来代替未改良的木材,同时满足人类的审美偏好。特定的视觉和触觉特性可以预测材料偏好,并可以在材料设计阶段加以考虑。触觉体验在整体材料感知中很重要,不应被忽视。这些发现在不同木材使用实践的国家似乎是稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wood and Fiber Science
Wood and Fiber Science 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: W&FS SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES INCLUDE THESE TOPIC AREAS: -Wood and Lignocellulosic Materials- Biomaterials- Timber Structures and Engineering- Biology- Nano-technology- Natural Fiber Composites- Timber Treatment and Harvesting- Botany- Mycology- Adhesives and Bioresins- Business Management and Marketing- Operations Research. SWST members have access to all full-text electronic versions of current and past Wood and Fiber Science issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信