Intransitive Encounter : Sino-U.S. Literatures and the Limits of Exchange by Nan Z. Da (review)

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hsuan L. Hsu
{"title":"Intransitive Encounter : Sino-U.S. Literatures and the Limits of Exchange by Nan Z. Da (review)","authors":"Hsuan L. Hsu","doi":"10.1353/mod.2021.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"587 deep history of Léger’s Ballet Mécanique pays off enormously at this point in the book) (65). An especially ludic example is the moment in Mon Oncle where the silhouettes of Monsieur and Madame Arpel looking out the two circular windows of their home at night make the windows look like enormous “eyes with moving pupils” (66). The final chapter turns toward modern architecture and class critique, deepening the historicizing work achieved in chapter one. Here, Turvey shows that Tati’s cinema, which often lampoons postwar modernist architecture, is not resistant to modernity (as is often assumed) but satirical of how the bourgeoisie adopt and impoverish the formal élan of experimental aesthetics. The Arpels’ home in Mon Oncle, for instance, is bad Le Corbusier, and the comedy that ensues from it (e.g., the two enormous windows mentioned above make the house look like a face, the water from the garden fountain sounds like urination) are Tati’s critique of midcentury French bourgeois suburbanization and how the obsession with status makes the middle class, well, ridiculous. It is because Turvey has so effectively gotten us to appreciate the diffuseness of Tati’s comedy—the fact that anyone and anything can be funny if we simply take the time to notice it—that his afterword shines so brightly. Here, Turvey performs an extended reading of the under-studied documentary Parade (1974), which Tati made for Swedish television in Stockholm. Parade is essentially a filmed circus performance, but the distinction between actors and nonactors remains persistently unclear. Turvey shows how Parade’s generic instability extends from Tati’s interest in how humor can permeate any and all situations and people. Under Turvey’s analytic lens, Parade suddenly makes complete sense without losing its inherent (and productive) strangeness. Play Time is a subtle, intelligent—and wonderfully funny—book. It has much to offer both Tati novices and his connoisseurs.","PeriodicalId":18699,"journal":{"name":"Modernism/modernity","volume":"28 1","pages":"587 - 589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernism/modernity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2021.0035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

587 deep history of Léger’s Ballet Mécanique pays off enormously at this point in the book) (65). An especially ludic example is the moment in Mon Oncle where the silhouettes of Monsieur and Madame Arpel looking out the two circular windows of their home at night make the windows look like enormous “eyes with moving pupils” (66). The final chapter turns toward modern architecture and class critique, deepening the historicizing work achieved in chapter one. Here, Turvey shows that Tati’s cinema, which often lampoons postwar modernist architecture, is not resistant to modernity (as is often assumed) but satirical of how the bourgeoisie adopt and impoverish the formal élan of experimental aesthetics. The Arpels’ home in Mon Oncle, for instance, is bad Le Corbusier, and the comedy that ensues from it (e.g., the two enormous windows mentioned above make the house look like a face, the water from the garden fountain sounds like urination) are Tati’s critique of midcentury French bourgeois suburbanization and how the obsession with status makes the middle class, well, ridiculous. It is because Turvey has so effectively gotten us to appreciate the diffuseness of Tati’s comedy—the fact that anyone and anything can be funny if we simply take the time to notice it—that his afterword shines so brightly. Here, Turvey performs an extended reading of the under-studied documentary Parade (1974), which Tati made for Swedish television in Stockholm. Parade is essentially a filmed circus performance, but the distinction between actors and nonactors remains persistently unclear. Turvey shows how Parade’s generic instability extends from Tati’s interest in how humor can permeate any and all situations and people. Under Turvey’s analytic lens, Parade suddenly makes complete sense without losing its inherent (and productive) strangeness. Play Time is a subtle, intelligent—and wonderfully funny—book. It has much to offer both Tati novices and his connoisseurs.
不及物接触:中美关系南之达的文献与交流界限(综述)
在这本书的这一点上,lsamger芭蕾舞团的深刻历史得到了极大的回报。一个特别滑稽的例子是在《我的舅舅》中,阿佩尔先生和夫人的剪影在晚上从他们家的两个圆形窗户向外看,使窗户看起来像巨大的“有移动瞳孔的眼睛”(66)。最后一章转向现代建筑和阶级批判,深化了第一章的历史化工作。在这里,特维展示了塔蒂的电影,它经常讽刺战后的现代主义建筑,并不抵制现代性(正如人们通常认为的那样),而是讽刺资产阶级如何采用并使实验美学的正式形式变得贫瘠。例如,雅宝在蒙奥科尔的家就像勒·柯布西耶(Le Corbusier),由此产生的喜剧(例如,上面提到的两扇巨大的窗户让房子看起来像一张脸,花园喷泉的水流听起来像小便)是塔蒂对上世纪中叶法国资产阶级郊区化的批评,以及对地位的痴迷如何让中产阶级变得可笑。正是因为特维如此有效地让我们欣赏了塔蒂喜剧的广泛性——事实上,只要我们肯花时间去注意,任何人、任何事都可以很有趣——他的后记才如此耀眼。在这里,特维对塔蒂在斯德哥尔摩为瑞典电视台制作的纪录片《游行》(Parade, 1974)进行了深入的解读。游行本质上是一场拍摄的马戏团表演,但演员和非演员之间的区别一直不清楚。特维展示了帕拉德的普遍不稳定是如何从塔蒂对幽默如何渗透到任何情况和人的兴趣中延伸出来的。在特维的分析镜头下,《游行》突然变得完全有意义,同时又不失其固有的(和富有成效的)陌生感。《玩乐时光》是一本微妙、智慧、有趣的书。它有很多提供给初学者和他的鉴赏家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modernism/modernity
Modernism/modernity HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Concentrating on the period extending roughly from 1860 to the present, Modernism/Modernity focuses on the methodological, archival, and theoretical exigencies particular to modernist studies. It encourages an interdisciplinary approach linking music, architecture, the visual arts, literature, and social and intellectual history. The journal"s broad scope fosters dialogue between social scientists and humanists about the history of modernism and its relations tomodernization. Each issue features a section of thematic essays as well as book reviews and a list of books received. Modernism/Modernity is now the official journal of the Modernist Studies Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信