Is green certification the solution to substandard indoor air quality (humidity)? A case study of old, new and green-certified dwellings

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Rochelle Ade, Michael Rehm
{"title":"Is green certification the solution to substandard indoor air quality (humidity)? A case study of old, new and green-certified dwellings","authors":"Rochelle Ade, Michael Rehm","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2021.1924300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT New Zealand is hamstrung by a housing crisis. Although the discourse primarily focuses on housing affordability and homelessness, there is a more pervasive problem afflicting New Zealanders: that New Zealand homes are substandard, being cold, damp and difficult to heat. This article reviews the moisture levels of three categories of housing (older vintage, newly constructed and newly constructed green certified) in Auckland, New Zealand, to determine whether the pervasive issue of high internal humidity in housing can be successfully rectified through using a green building certification. The results show that newly constructed 6-Homestar dwellings are in the optimal relative humidity range mean 14 per cent of time in contrast to 17 per cent for new code-compliant dwellings (and six per cent for older vintage dwellings) in the damp winter months of June through August. This research documents that a particular green certification – 6-Homestar – may not deliver suitable humidity control, and that alternative certifications that stipulate airtightness levels and require active ventilation – such as Passive House – could be considered by policy makers interested in delivering low-carbon, warm, dry houses in New Zealand.","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"28 1","pages":"126 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14486563.2021.1924300","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2021.1924300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT New Zealand is hamstrung by a housing crisis. Although the discourse primarily focuses on housing affordability and homelessness, there is a more pervasive problem afflicting New Zealanders: that New Zealand homes are substandard, being cold, damp and difficult to heat. This article reviews the moisture levels of three categories of housing (older vintage, newly constructed and newly constructed green certified) in Auckland, New Zealand, to determine whether the pervasive issue of high internal humidity in housing can be successfully rectified through using a green building certification. The results show that newly constructed 6-Homestar dwellings are in the optimal relative humidity range mean 14 per cent of time in contrast to 17 per cent for new code-compliant dwellings (and six per cent for older vintage dwellings) in the damp winter months of June through August. This research documents that a particular green certification – 6-Homestar – may not deliver suitable humidity control, and that alternative certifications that stipulate airtightness levels and require active ventilation – such as Passive House – could be considered by policy makers interested in delivering low-carbon, warm, dry houses in New Zealand.
绿色认证是解决室内空气质量(湿度)不达标的办法吗?新旧绿色认证住宅案例研究
摘要新西兰因住房危机而陷入困境。尽管讨论主要集中在住房负担能力和无家可归问题上,但还有一个更普遍的问题困扰着新西兰人:新西兰的住房不合格,又冷又潮湿,难以供暖。本文回顾了新西兰奥克兰三类住房(老式、新建和新建绿色认证)的湿度水平,以确定是否可以通过使用绿色建筑认证成功纠正住房中普遍存在的内部高湿度问题。结果显示,新建的6-Homestar住宅平均有14%的时间处于最佳相对湿度范围内,而在6月至8月的潮湿冬季,符合规范的新住宅为17%(老式住宅为6%)。这项研究表明,特定的绿色认证——6-Homestar——可能无法提供合适的湿度控制,而有兴趣在新西兰提供低碳、温暖、干燥房屋的政策制定者可以考虑规定气密性水平并需要主动通风的替代认证,如被动式房屋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信