Testing of outward leakage of different types of masks with a breathing manikin head, ultraviolet light and coloured water mist

IF 2.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
M. Ortiz, Marzieh Ghasemieshkaftaki, P. Bluyssen
{"title":"Testing of outward leakage of different types of masks with a breathing manikin head, ultraviolet light and coloured water mist","authors":"M. Ortiz, Marzieh Ghasemieshkaftaki, P. Bluyssen","doi":"10.1080/17508975.2021.1951153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the outbreak of COVID-19, wearing a mask, voluntary or obligatory, has led to diverse and numerous designs. Guidelines for minimum requirements include tests for visual inspection, strength, filtration, and breathing resistance, but not for the fit of a mask. The fit of a mask was assessed by testing the outward leakage of exhaled breath based on the visualization of coloured mist exhaled by a manikin head. Fourteen masks were selected based on differences in design, such as type of material, shape (cheek wings vs. none), filter type, and the number of layers. Leakage expressed in mean mist percentages (visualized with a camera), patterns of coloured mist left inside the masks, as well as visual fit of the masks on the manikin head, showed that a loose fit mask results in more leakage. Also, combining quantitative with qualitative assessment proved to be complementary. Future tests should be conducted on a range of users, covering the best fit over time as well breathability, use, and comfort. The use of face masks, whatever their characteristics, seem an adequate strategy to reduce the dispersion of potential ‘infected’ aerosols into the space from people, as opposed to not wearing one.","PeriodicalId":45828,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Buildings International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17508975.2021.1951153","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Buildings International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2021.1951153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since the outbreak of COVID-19, wearing a mask, voluntary or obligatory, has led to diverse and numerous designs. Guidelines for minimum requirements include tests for visual inspection, strength, filtration, and breathing resistance, but not for the fit of a mask. The fit of a mask was assessed by testing the outward leakage of exhaled breath based on the visualization of coloured mist exhaled by a manikin head. Fourteen masks were selected based on differences in design, such as type of material, shape (cheek wings vs. none), filter type, and the number of layers. Leakage expressed in mean mist percentages (visualized with a camera), patterns of coloured mist left inside the masks, as well as visual fit of the masks on the manikin head, showed that a loose fit mask results in more leakage. Also, combining quantitative with qualitative assessment proved to be complementary. Future tests should be conducted on a range of users, covering the best fit over time as well breathability, use, and comfort. The use of face masks, whatever their characteristics, seem an adequate strategy to reduce the dispersion of potential ‘infected’ aerosols into the space from people, as opposed to not wearing one.
带呼吸假人头部、紫外线和彩色细水雾的不同类型口罩向外泄漏的测试
自2019冠状病毒病爆发以来,无论是自愿佩戴还是强制佩戴,都出现了各种各样的口罩设计。最低要求指南包括目视检查、强度、过滤和呼吸阻力测试,但不包括口罩的适合性测试。通过对假人头部呼出的彩色雾气的可视化,测试呼出气体的向外泄漏量,评估口罩的贴合度。根据设计的不同,如材料类型、形状(脸颊翅膀或没有)、过滤器类型和层数,选择了14个口罩。泄漏以平均雾百分比表示(用相机可视化),面具内留下的彩色雾的图案,以及面具在假人头上的视觉契合度,表明宽松的面具会导致更多的泄漏。定量评价与定性评价相结合是相辅相成的。未来的测试应该在用户范围内进行,包括随着时间的推移,最适合的,以及透气性,使用性和舒适性。使用口罩,无论其特点如何,似乎是一种适当的策略,以减少潜在的“感染”气溶胶从人们扩散到太空,而不是不戴口罩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligent Buildings International
Intelligent Buildings International CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信