Dramatyzacja tradycji. Dramaturgiczne konfrontacje z kanonem literackim

Q4 Arts and Humanities
P. Dobrowolski
{"title":"Dramatyzacja tradycji. Dramaturgiczne konfrontacje z kanonem literackim","authors":"P. Dobrowolski","doi":"10.14746/pt.2021.36.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article opens with a statement that dramaturgical creativity, long marginalized by literary studies, has returned to the area of its interest together with its researchers’ use of the achievements of performative and cultural turns. Taking these into account allows us to treat drama as a distinctive literary practice in which the reception of a text is exemplary. As the author claims, with the New Humanities, integrating scattered reading perspectives known to the history of literary studies into the horizons of New Positivity, dramatic studies enrich this standpoint and maintain a critical view making creative use of the antagonism of perspectives, confrontation of attitudes, conflict of qualities or different visions and ideas. The potential tensions revealed in the practice of active reading of a literary text in accordance with the dramatic matrix guarantee the positive effects of each act of engaged reading. The dramatization of tradition is a specific field of critical dialogue between the reader and the existing literary tradition. Three dramatic works by Jan Czapliński are indicated as examples of mediators for this dialogue. The work of this playwright presents and suggests a critical reading of the characters and works of Gabriela Zapolska, Henryk Sienkiewicz and Adam Mickiewicz, leading to the emancipation of their works that is situated beyond the framework of the discursively created, existing canon of contemporary Polish literature and culture. A critical view enriches and updates the canon. Dramatization, which allows the revaluation of existing values, appears as the basic category of contemporary art – revealing existing, usually ineffable conflicts and using them to build new, positive values.","PeriodicalId":37837,"journal":{"name":"Przestrzenie Teorii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przestrzenie Teorii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pt.2021.36.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article opens with a statement that dramaturgical creativity, long marginalized by literary studies, has returned to the area of its interest together with its researchers’ use of the achievements of performative and cultural turns. Taking these into account allows us to treat drama as a distinctive literary practice in which the reception of a text is exemplary. As the author claims, with the New Humanities, integrating scattered reading perspectives known to the history of literary studies into the horizons of New Positivity, dramatic studies enrich this standpoint and maintain a critical view making creative use of the antagonism of perspectives, confrontation of attitudes, conflict of qualities or different visions and ideas. The potential tensions revealed in the practice of active reading of a literary text in accordance with the dramatic matrix guarantee the positive effects of each act of engaged reading. The dramatization of tradition is a specific field of critical dialogue between the reader and the existing literary tradition. Three dramatic works by Jan Czapliński are indicated as examples of mediators for this dialogue. The work of this playwright presents and suggests a critical reading of the characters and works of Gabriela Zapolska, Henryk Sienkiewicz and Adam Mickiewicz, leading to the emancipation of their works that is situated beyond the framework of the discursively created, existing canon of contemporary Polish literature and culture. A critical view enriches and updates the canon. Dramatization, which allows the revaluation of existing values, appears as the basic category of contemporary art – revealing existing, usually ineffable conflicts and using them to build new, positive values.
戏剧化的传统。戏剧与文学经典的对抗
文章首先指出,长期被文学研究边缘化的戏剧创造力,随着研究人员对表演和文化转向成果的利用,已经回到了它感兴趣的领域。考虑到这些,我们可以将戏剧视为一种独特的文学实践,在这种实践中,文本的接受是典型的。正如作者所说,在新人文主义中,戏剧研究将文学史上已知的零散的阅读视角融入到新实证主义的视野中,创造性地利用视角的对立、态度的对抗、素质的冲突或不同的视野和思想,丰富了这一观点,并保持了一种批判性的观点。在按照戏剧矩阵积极阅读文学文本的实践中,潜在的紧张关系保证了每一次参与阅读行为的积极效果。传统戏剧化是读者与现存文学传统进行批判性对话的一个特定领域。Jan Czapliński的三部戏剧作品是此次对话的调解人。这位剧作家的作品呈现并建议对加布里埃拉·扎波尔斯卡、亨里克·西恩凯维奇和亚当·米凯维奇的人物和作品进行批判性解读,从而解放了他们的作品,这些作品超越了当代波兰文学和文化的散漫创作和现有经典。批判性的观点丰富和更新了正典。戏剧化是当代艺术的基本范畴,它允许重新评估现有的价值观——揭示现有的、通常无法言喻的冲突,并利用它们来建立新的、积极的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Przestrzenie Teorii
Przestrzenie Teorii Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: “Przestrzenie Teorii” is a theoretical and literary journal of scholarly criticism. The journal is peer-reviewed and reflects the research interests of authors from across a wide range of universities in Poland, as well as presents translations of texts of distinguished foreign theoreticians in literature. The journal undertakes to present key and essential problems in the contemporary criticism and theory of literature, and provides a platform for a transdisciplinary dialogue. The published texts, presented in diversified methodological approach, address both aesthetical and poetical problems in different areas of research, encompassing theatre and film, but also drama and art (in particular, visual and performative art forms). The journal is characterized by its interdiciplinary approach, participates in the present-day scholarly discourse in the philosophy of science and attempts to effect its policy of fostering the polyphonic form of literary studies in drama. “Przestrzenie Teorii” is published semi-annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信