Identifying grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis

Shelia X. Wei, Helena H. Zhang, Howell Y. Wang, F. Y. Ye
{"title":"Identifying grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis","authors":"Shelia X. Wei, Helena H. Zhang, Howell Y. Wang, F. Y. Ye","doi":"10.2478/jdis-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose Following the typical features of the grey-rhino event as predictability and profound influence, we attempt to find a special pattern called the grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis. Design/methodology/approach We propose to combine triadic patent families and technology life cycle to define the grey-rhino model. Firstly, we design the indicator rhino-index Rh = ST/SP and descriptor sequence {Rh}, where ST and SP are the accumulative number of triadic patent families and all patent families respectively for a specific technology. Secondly, according to the two typical features of the grey-rhino event, a grey-rhino is defined as a technology that meets both qualitative and quantitative conditions. Qualitatively, this technology has a profound influence. Quantitatively, in the emerging stage, Rh ≥ Rae, where Rae is the average level of the proportion of triadic patent families. Finally, this model is verified in three datasets, namely Encyclopedia Britannica's list for the greatest inventions (EB technologies for short), MIT breakthrough technologies (MIT technologies) and Derwent Manual Code technologies (MAN technologies). Findings The result shows that there are 64.71% EB technologies and 50.00% MIT technologies meeting the quantitative standard of the grey-rhino model, but only 14.71% MAN technologies fit the quantitative standard. This falling trend indicates the quantitative standard of the grey-rhino model is reasonable. EB technologies and MIT technologies have profound influence on society, which means they satisfy the qualitative standard of the grey-rhino model. Hence, 64.71% EB technologies and 50.00% MIT technologies are grey-rhinos. In 14.71% MAN technologies meeting the quantitative standard, we make some qualitative judgments and deem U11-A01A, U12-A01A1A, and W01-A01A as grey-rhino technologies. In addition, grey-rhinos and non-grey-rhinos have some differences. Rh values of grey-rhinos have a downward trend, while Rh values of non-grey-rhinos have a contrary trend. Rh values of grey-rhinos are scattered relatively in the early stage and centralize gradually, but non-grey-rhinos do not have this feature. Research limitations There are four main limitations. First, if a technology satisfies the quantitative standard of the model, it is likely to be a grey-rhino but expert judgments are necessary. Second, we don’t know why it will be eminent, which involves technical contents. Thirdly, we did not consider the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA) which also play important roles in worldwide patents, so we hope to expand our study to the CNIPA and the DPMA. Furthermore, we did not compare the rhino-index with other patent indicators. Practical implications If a technology meets the quantitative standard, this can be seen as early warning signals and the technology may become a grey-rhino in the future, which can catch people's attention in the emerging stage and make people seize the technical opportunity early. Originality/value We define and verify a new pattern called the grey-rhino model in eminent technologies.","PeriodicalId":92237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","volume":"8 1","pages":"47 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Following the typical features of the grey-rhino event as predictability and profound influence, we attempt to find a special pattern called the grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis. Design/methodology/approach We propose to combine triadic patent families and technology life cycle to define the grey-rhino model. Firstly, we design the indicator rhino-index Rh = ST/SP and descriptor sequence {Rh}, where ST and SP are the accumulative number of triadic patent families and all patent families respectively for a specific technology. Secondly, according to the two typical features of the grey-rhino event, a grey-rhino is defined as a technology that meets both qualitative and quantitative conditions. Qualitatively, this technology has a profound influence. Quantitatively, in the emerging stage, Rh ≥ Rae, where Rae is the average level of the proportion of triadic patent families. Finally, this model is verified in three datasets, namely Encyclopedia Britannica's list for the greatest inventions (EB technologies for short), MIT breakthrough technologies (MIT technologies) and Derwent Manual Code technologies (MAN technologies). Findings The result shows that there are 64.71% EB technologies and 50.00% MIT technologies meeting the quantitative standard of the grey-rhino model, but only 14.71% MAN technologies fit the quantitative standard. This falling trend indicates the quantitative standard of the grey-rhino model is reasonable. EB technologies and MIT technologies have profound influence on society, which means they satisfy the qualitative standard of the grey-rhino model. Hence, 64.71% EB technologies and 50.00% MIT technologies are grey-rhinos. In 14.71% MAN technologies meeting the quantitative standard, we make some qualitative judgments and deem U11-A01A, U12-A01A1A, and W01-A01A as grey-rhino technologies. In addition, grey-rhinos and non-grey-rhinos have some differences. Rh values of grey-rhinos have a downward trend, while Rh values of non-grey-rhinos have a contrary trend. Rh values of grey-rhinos are scattered relatively in the early stage and centralize gradually, but non-grey-rhinos do not have this feature. Research limitations There are four main limitations. First, if a technology satisfies the quantitative standard of the model, it is likely to be a grey-rhino but expert judgments are necessary. Second, we don’t know why it will be eminent, which involves technical contents. Thirdly, we did not consider the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA) which also play important roles in worldwide patents, so we hope to expand our study to the CNIPA and the DPMA. Furthermore, we did not compare the rhino-index with other patent indicators. Practical implications If a technology meets the quantitative standard, this can be seen as early warning signals and the technology may become a grey-rhino in the future, which can catch people's attention in the emerging stage and make people seize the technical opportunity early. Originality/value We define and verify a new pattern called the grey-rhino model in eminent technologies.
通过专利分析识别著名技术中的灰犀牛
摘要目的根据灰犀牛事件的可预测性和深远影响的典型特征,我们试图通过专利分析在知名技术中找到一种特殊的模式,称为灰犀牛。设计/方法论/方法我们建议将三元专利家族和技术生命周期相结合来定义灰犀牛模型。首先,我们设计了指标rhino索引Rh=ST/SP和描述符序列{Rh},其中ST和SP分别是特定技术的三元专利族和所有专利族的累积数量。其次,根据灰犀牛事件的两个典型特征,将灰犀牛定义为同时满足定性和定量条件的技术。从质量上讲,这项技术具有深远的影响。从数量上讲,在新兴阶段,Rh≥Rae,其中Rae是三元专利家族比例的平均水平。最后,该模型在三个数据集中得到了验证,即大英百科全书的最伟大发明列表(简称EB技术)、麻省理工学院的突破性技术(MIT技术)和德温特手动编码技术(MAN技术)。结果表明,符合灰犀牛模型定量标准的EB技术和MIT技术分别占64.71%和50.00%,而符合定量标准的MAN技术仅占14.71%。这种下降趋势表明灰犀牛模型的定量标准是合理的。EB技术和MIT技术对社会有着深远的影响,这意味着它们满足了灰犀牛模型的定性标准。因此,64.71%的EB技术和50.00%的MIT技术是灰犀牛。在14.71%符合定量标准的MAN技术中,我们进行了一些定性判断,认为U11-A01A、U12-A01A1A和W01-A01A是灰犀牛技术。此外,灰犀牛和非灰犀牛也有一些区别。灰犀牛的Rh值呈下降趋势,而非灰犀牛的Rh值呈相反趋势。灰犀牛的Rh值在早期相对分散,并逐渐集中,但非灰犀牛不具有这一特征。研究局限性主要有四个局限性。首先,如果一项技术满足模型的定量标准,它很可能是一头灰犀牛,但专家的判断是必要的。第二,我们不知道为什么它会引人注目,这涉及到技术内容。第三,我们没有考虑到中国国家知识产权局(CNIPA)和德国专利商标局(DPMA)在全球专利中也发挥着重要作用,因此我们希望将我们的研究扩展到CNIPA和DPMA。此外,我们没有将犀牛指数与其他专利指标进行比较。实际意义如果一项技术符合量化标准,这可以被视为早期预警信号,该技术可能在未来成为灰犀牛,在新兴阶段引起人们的注意,使人们尽早抓住技术机会。独创性/价值我们在知名技术中定义并验证了一种称为灰犀牛模型的新模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信