Identity and community of practice in the incident of Samuel Orellana at the Neruda Foundation poetry workshop

IF 0.4 0 LITERATURE
Magdalena Palacios Bianchi
{"title":"Identity and community of practice in the incident of Samuel Orellana at the Neruda Foundation poetry workshop","authors":"Magdalena Palacios Bianchi","doi":"10.1080/14790726.2022.2025849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study employed the narrative interview method to examine the incident of Samuel Orellana, a heteronym created in 2003 by two Literature students who invented Orellana to call into question the policies of the Pablo Neruda Foundation poetry workshop, the most prestigious workshop in Chile. More specifically, data were obtained from three sources, including the creators of Orellana (via narrative interviews), publications that mentioned the incident on Twitter in reference to the account name @Estereoscopio_ (profile of one of the creators), and poems written under the Orellana heteronym on Cyber Humanitatis (a Universidad de Chile website). After collecting data following these procedures, we conducted a qualitative case analysis using the ATLAS.ti software, where one code was used as a reference for analysis (i.e. identity): interviews, publications and poems were segmented, codes were assigned to each segment, including comments and annotations (memos). By using this method, we were able to build a relational database from which the programme generated semantic networks, which we then interpreted. This study shows an example of what happens when not all creative identities involved in a creative writing community are allowed to learn and exchange knowledge.","PeriodicalId":43222,"journal":{"name":"New Writing-The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing","volume":"20 1","pages":"72 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Writing-The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2022.2025849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study employed the narrative interview method to examine the incident of Samuel Orellana, a heteronym created in 2003 by two Literature students who invented Orellana to call into question the policies of the Pablo Neruda Foundation poetry workshop, the most prestigious workshop in Chile. More specifically, data were obtained from three sources, including the creators of Orellana (via narrative interviews), publications that mentioned the incident on Twitter in reference to the account name @Estereoscopio_ (profile of one of the creators), and poems written under the Orellana heteronym on Cyber Humanitatis (a Universidad de Chile website). After collecting data following these procedures, we conducted a qualitative case analysis using the ATLAS.ti software, where one code was used as a reference for analysis (i.e. identity): interviews, publications and poems were segmented, codes were assigned to each segment, including comments and annotations (memos). By using this method, we were able to build a relational database from which the programme generated semantic networks, which we then interpreted. This study shows an example of what happens when not all creative identities involved in a creative writing community are allowed to learn and exchange knowledge.
在聂鲁达基金会诗歌工作坊Samuel Orellana事件中的身份和实践社区
摘要:本研究采用叙事访谈法考察Samuel Orellana事件。Samuel Orellana是两位文学专业学生于2003年创造的一个异名词,他们为了质疑智利最负盛名的巴勃罗·聂鲁达基金会诗歌研讨会的政策而创造了这个异名词。更具体地说,数据来自三个来源,包括Orellana的创作者(通过叙述性访谈)、Twitter上提及该事件的文章(其中一位创作者的个人资料),以及Cyber Humanitatis(智利大学网站)上以Orellana的异名所写的诗歌。在按照这些程序收集数据后,我们使用ATLAS进行了定性病例分析。Ti软件,其中使用一个代码作为参考进行分析(即身份):采访,出版物和诗歌被分割,代码被分配到每个部分,包括评论和注释(备忘录)。通过使用这种方法,我们能够建立一个关系数据库,程序从中生成语义网络,然后我们对其进行解释。这项研究展示了一个例子,当不是所有参与创意写作社区的创意身份都被允许学习和交流知识时会发生什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信