Sitting in limbo or being the flaming Phoenix: the relevance of the archival discipline to the admissibility of digital evidence in China

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Weimei Pan, L. Duranti
{"title":"Sitting in limbo or being the flaming Phoenix: the relevance of the archival discipline to the admissibility of digital evidence in China","authors":"Weimei Pan, L. Duranti","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2020.1822892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents a review of the progress made in the digital transition in China, especially in light of the fact that admissibility of digital records in legal proceedings is a critical factor in such transition. It discusses the Chinese legal system and the rules governing the admissibility of both paper and digital records as well as the reasons why evidence collection and preservation by a third party has become a popular approach to guarantee the integrity of the records and improve their chances of admissibility in a court of law. In this context, this article then discusses how the InterPARES Trust PaaST model can help address some of the issues, thus, demonstrating the relevance of archival knowledge to the digital transition.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"48 1","pages":"300 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2020.1822892","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2020.1822892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents a review of the progress made in the digital transition in China, especially in light of the fact that admissibility of digital records in legal proceedings is a critical factor in such transition. It discusses the Chinese legal system and the rules governing the admissibility of both paper and digital records as well as the reasons why evidence collection and preservation by a third party has become a popular approach to guarantee the integrity of the records and improve their chances of admissibility in a court of law. In this context, this article then discusses how the InterPARES Trust PaaST model can help address some of the issues, thus, demonstrating the relevance of archival knowledge to the digital transition.
坐在地狱还是做燃烧的凤凰:档案学科与中国数字证据可采性的相关性
摘要本文回顾了中国在数字转型方面取得的进展,特别是考虑到数字记录在法律诉讼中的可采性是这一转型的关键因素。它讨论了中国的法律制度和管理纸质和数字记录可采性的规则,以及为什么第三方收集和保存证据已成为保证记录完整性和提高其在法庭上可采性机会的一种流行方法的原因。在这种背景下,本文讨论了InterPARES Trust PaaST模型如何帮助解决一些问题,从而证明档案知识与数字转型的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives and Manuscripts
Archives and Manuscripts INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信