Postplacental insertion of IUCD Cu T 380A at transcesarean section does not influence bleeding and infection at puerperial period

Menik Utami, B. Winardi
{"title":"Postplacental insertion of IUCD Cu T 380A at transcesarean section does not influence bleeding and infection at puerperial period","authors":"Menik Utami, B. Winardi","doi":"10.20473/MOG.V26I22018.61-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the difference of the puerperial bleeding and puerperial infection women who had intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) T380A insertion at caesarean section compare with women who had caesarean section without IUCD insertion.Materials and Methods: This study was an observasional analytic prospective cohort. Participants allocated to 2 groups : IUCD inserted during cesarean and cesarean with no device inserted. Subject research monitoring at 10 and 40 day of puerperial period.Results: Puerperial bleeding of group with IUCD insertion is 99,309+32,845 ml and group without IUCD is 88,010+30,824 ml, with the analysis test got p=0,085 (p>0,05) means no difference between two groups.Level hemoglobin at post cesarean section (day-0), 10 and 40 day, proportion increasing severity of anemia and duration of lochia rubra were analized and got p>0,05, no difference between two groups. Duration of puerperial bleeding period, median group with IUCD 40 days (25-50) and group without IUCD 30 days (26-45), with analized test got p<0,05. Duration of puerperial bleeding were significantly difference. Proportion of clinical sign puerperial infection 3 (6,4%) of group with IUCD and 2 (4,1%) of group without IUCD, with analized test got p=0,614 (p>0,05), no difference between two groups. Level of leucocyte at post cesarean section (day-0), 10 and 40 day, the difference both two groups was not significant (p>0,05). In this research the difference puerperial bleeding and proportion puerperial infection between two groups (women who had IUCD T380A insertion at caesarean section compare with women who had caesarean section without IUCD insertion) was no significant.Conclusion: Insertion IUCD Cu T 380A postplacental at caesarean section is safety.","PeriodicalId":52893,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/MOG.V26I22018.61-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To determine the difference of the puerperial bleeding and puerperial infection women who had intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) T380A insertion at caesarean section compare with women who had caesarean section without IUCD insertion.Materials and Methods: This study was an observasional analytic prospective cohort. Participants allocated to 2 groups : IUCD inserted during cesarean and cesarean with no device inserted. Subject research monitoring at 10 and 40 day of puerperial period.Results: Puerperial bleeding of group with IUCD insertion is 99,309+32,845 ml and group without IUCD is 88,010+30,824 ml, with the analysis test got p=0,085 (p>0,05) means no difference between two groups.Level hemoglobin at post cesarean section (day-0), 10 and 40 day, proportion increasing severity of anemia and duration of lochia rubra were analized and got p>0,05, no difference between two groups. Duration of puerperial bleeding period, median group with IUCD 40 days (25-50) and group without IUCD 30 days (26-45), with analized test got p<0,05. Duration of puerperial bleeding were significantly difference. Proportion of clinical sign puerperial infection 3 (6,4%) of group with IUCD and 2 (4,1%) of group without IUCD, with analized test got p=0,614 (p>0,05), no difference between two groups. Level of leucocyte at post cesarean section (day-0), 10 and 40 day, the difference both two groups was not significant (p>0,05). In this research the difference puerperial bleeding and proportion puerperial infection between two groups (women who had IUCD T380A insertion at caesarean section compare with women who had caesarean section without IUCD insertion) was no significant.Conclusion: Insertion IUCD Cu T 380A postplacental at caesarean section is safety.
宫内节育器CuT 380A在剖宫产时胎盘后放置对产褥期出血和感染没有影响
目的:比较剖宫产时使用宫内节育器(IUCD)T380A的产妇与未使用IUCD的产妇在产褥出血和产褥感染方面的差异。材料与方法:本研究为前瞻性观察分析队列研究。参与者分为两组:剖宫产时插入宫内节育器和未插入节育器的剖宫产。产后10天和40天的受试者研究监测。结果:放置宫内节育器组为99309±32845ml,未放置宫内节育环组为88010±30824ml,两组比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。分析剖宫产术后(0天)、10天和40天的血红蛋白水平、贫血加重程度的比例和红恶露持续时间,两组差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。产褥期出血时间,IUCD组中位数40天(25~50天),无IUCD组为30天(26~45天),经方差分析得p0,05),两组差异无统计学意义。剖宫产术后第0天、第10天和第40天的白细胞水平,两组差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在本研究中,两组(剖腹产时插入宫内节育器T380A的妇女与未插入宫内节育环的剖腹产妇女相比)的产褥出血和产褥感染比例差异无统计学意义。结论:剖宫产胎盘后放置宫内节育器CuT380A是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信