{"title":"The coordinators i and z in Polish: A cognitive-typological approach (Part 2)","authors":"A. Andrason","doi":"10.1515/linpo-2017-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Developed within the frame of cognitive and typological linguistics, the present study examines the taxonomical status of the lexemes i and z in Polish. To achieve this aim, the author analyzes the compliance of the two forms with the prototype of coordinate-hood and the structure of their maps of polyfunctionality. The evidence demonstrates that i is a canonical instantiation of the category of coordinate-hood while z is less canonical. Additionally, the two lexemes yield different maps of polyfunctionality (with distinct prototypicality nuclei), which reflects their distinct diachronic and conceptual origin. The map of i radiates from the value of ‘also’ while the map of z radiates from a comitative sense. This article – the last in a series of two – completes the presentation of the empirical evidence and interprets it within the adopted framework. The degrees of canonicity of i and z are determined and the semantic-functional maps of the two lexemes are compared.","PeriodicalId":35103,"journal":{"name":"Lingua Posnaniensis","volume":"59 1","pages":"22 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua Posnaniensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2017-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Abstract Developed within the frame of cognitive and typological linguistics, the present study examines the taxonomical status of the lexemes i and z in Polish. To achieve this aim, the author analyzes the compliance of the two forms with the prototype of coordinate-hood and the structure of their maps of polyfunctionality. The evidence demonstrates that i is a canonical instantiation of the category of coordinate-hood while z is less canonical. Additionally, the two lexemes yield different maps of polyfunctionality (with distinct prototypicality nuclei), which reflects their distinct diachronic and conceptual origin. The map of i radiates from the value of ‘also’ while the map of z radiates from a comitative sense. This article – the last in a series of two – completes the presentation of the empirical evidence and interprets it within the adopted framework. The degrees of canonicity of i and z are determined and the semantic-functional maps of the two lexemes are compared.
在认知语言学和类型语言学的框架内发展,本研究考察了波兰语中词汇i和z的分类学地位。为了达到这一目的,作者分析了这两种形式与座标原型的遵从性及其多功能映射的结构。证据表明,i是坐标-hood范畴的典型实例,而z则不那么典型。此外,这两种词汇产生了不同的多功能性地图(具有不同的原型核),这反映了它们不同的历时和概念起源。i的映射从' also '的值发散,而z的映射从模仿意义发散。本文——两篇系列文章中的最后一篇——完成了经验证据的呈现,并在采用的框架内对其进行了解释。确定了i和z的正则度,并比较了这两个词的语义功能映射。