Investigating the Impact of Independent Rule Fitnesses in a Learning Classifier System

Bioma Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2207.05582
Michael Heider, Helena Stegherr, Jonathan Wurth, Roman Sraj, J. Hähner
{"title":"Investigating the Impact of Independent Rule Fitnesses in a Learning Classifier System","authors":"Michael Heider, Helena Stegherr, Jonathan Wurth, Roman Sraj, J. Hähner","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2207.05582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving at least some level of explainability requires complex analyses for many machine learning systems, such as common black-box models. We recently proposed a new rule-based learning system, SupRB, to construct compact, interpretable and transparent models by utilizing separate optimizers for the model selection tasks concerning rule discovery and rule set composition.This allows users to specifically tailor their model structure to fulfil use-case specific explainability requirements. From an optimization perspective, this allows us to define clearer goals and we find that -- in contrast to many state of the art systems -- this allows us to keep rule fitnesses independent. In this paper we investigate this system's performance thoroughly on a set of regression problems and compare it against XCSF, a prominent rule-based learning system. We find the overall results of SupRB's evaluation comparable to XCSF's while allowing easier control of model structure and showing a substantially smaller sensitivity to random seeds and data splits. This increased control can aid in subsequently providing explanations for both training and final structure of the model.","PeriodicalId":32117,"journal":{"name":"Bioma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.05582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Achieving at least some level of explainability requires complex analyses for many machine learning systems, such as common black-box models. We recently proposed a new rule-based learning system, SupRB, to construct compact, interpretable and transparent models by utilizing separate optimizers for the model selection tasks concerning rule discovery and rule set composition.This allows users to specifically tailor their model structure to fulfil use-case specific explainability requirements. From an optimization perspective, this allows us to define clearer goals and we find that -- in contrast to many state of the art systems -- this allows us to keep rule fitnesses independent. In this paper we investigate this system's performance thoroughly on a set of regression problems and compare it against XCSF, a prominent rule-based learning system. We find the overall results of SupRB's evaluation comparable to XCSF's while allowing easier control of model structure and showing a substantially smaller sensitivity to random seeds and data splits. This increased control can aid in subsequently providing explanations for both training and final structure of the model.
学习分类器系统中独立规则拟合的影响研究
实现至少一定程度的可解释性需要对许多机器学习系统进行复杂的分析,例如常见的黑匣子模型。我们最近提出了一种新的基于规则的学习系统SupRB,通过使用单独的优化器来执行有关规则发现和规则集组成的模型选择任务,来构建紧凑、可解释和透明的模型。这允许用户专门定制他们的模型结构,以满足用例特定的可解释性要求。从优化的角度来看,这使我们能够定义更清晰的目标,并且我们发现,与许多最先进的系统相比,这允许我们保持规则一致性的独立性。在本文中,我们深入研究了该系统在一组回归问题上的性能,并将其与XCSF(一个著名的基于规则的学习系统)进行了比较。我们发现,SupRB的评估总体结果与XCSF的评估结果相当,同时允许更容易地控制模型结构,并显示出对随机种子和数据分割的敏感性要小得多。这种增加的控制可以帮助随后提供对模型的训练和最终结构的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信