Eric D. Tifft, Max Z. Roberts, Shannon B. Underwood, J. P. Forsyth
{"title":"Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Problematic Anger: A Case Study","authors":"Eric D. Tifft, Max Z. Roberts, Shannon B. Underwood, J. P. Forsyth","doi":"10.1177/15346501221080931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though anger is a common human emotion, the unfettered behavioral expression of anger is often costly, contributing to a range of functional impairments, poor quality of life, and both physical and mental health problems. The current case illustrates how a third-generation cognitive behavioral therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), may be effective in reducing suffering linked with problematic anger. The client (“Robert”), a treatment-naïve man of low socioeconomic status, presented to a university training clinic reporting problematic anger outbursts that interfered with his relationships at work and with his girlfriend. The therapist conceptualized Robert’s problematic anger through the ACT psychological flexibility model, wherein Robert’s anger appeared to function as experiential avoidance to distance him from underlying emotional hurt. The therapist used ACT over 27 sessions to reduce Robert’s psychological inflexibility while promoting more psychological flexibility. Early sessions highlighted the unworkability of Robert’s anger, whereas subsequent sessions focused on clarifying values, loosening cognitive fusion, facilitating present moment awareness, and cultivating mindful acceptance in the service of living a meaningful life. The therapist monitored treatment progress using quantitative measures and qualitative reports. Collectively, the client showed notable gains. The case study adds to the growing body of literature supporting ACT for problematic anger.","PeriodicalId":46059,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Case Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"355 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15346501221080931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Though anger is a common human emotion, the unfettered behavioral expression of anger is often costly, contributing to a range of functional impairments, poor quality of life, and both physical and mental health problems. The current case illustrates how a third-generation cognitive behavioral therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), may be effective in reducing suffering linked with problematic anger. The client (“Robert”), a treatment-naïve man of low socioeconomic status, presented to a university training clinic reporting problematic anger outbursts that interfered with his relationships at work and with his girlfriend. The therapist conceptualized Robert’s problematic anger through the ACT psychological flexibility model, wherein Robert’s anger appeared to function as experiential avoidance to distance him from underlying emotional hurt. The therapist used ACT over 27 sessions to reduce Robert’s psychological inflexibility while promoting more psychological flexibility. Early sessions highlighted the unworkability of Robert’s anger, whereas subsequent sessions focused on clarifying values, loosening cognitive fusion, facilitating present moment awareness, and cultivating mindful acceptance in the service of living a meaningful life. The therapist monitored treatment progress using quantitative measures and qualitative reports. Collectively, the client showed notable gains. The case study adds to the growing body of literature supporting ACT for problematic anger.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Case Studies seeks manuscripts that articulate various theoretical frameworks. All manuscripts will require an abstract and must adhere to the following format: (1) Theoretical and Research Basis, (2) Case Introduction, (3) Presenting Complaints, (4) History, (5) Assessment, (6) Case Conceptualization (this is where the clinician"s thinking and treatment selection come to the forefront), (7) Course of Treatment and Assessment of Progress, (8) Complicating Factors (including medical management), (9) Managed Care Considerations (if any), (10) Follow-up (how and how long), (11) Treatment Implications of the Case, (12) Recommendations to Clinicians and Students, and References.