Evaluating the effect of new working practices on office space usage in Hong Kong

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
W. M. Jayantha, O. Oladinrin
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of new working practices on office space usage in Hong Kong","authors":"W. M. Jayantha, O. Oladinrin","doi":"10.1108/jcre-06-2019-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMany organizations in Hong Kong have witnessed a reduction in average space usage due to high occupancy costs. New working practices (NWPs) are viewed as a reform tool to manage expensive real estate around the world. However, it is unclear whether NWPs influence office space usage in business organizations in Hong Kong. This study, therefore, aims to evaluate if the average space reduction in office firms is caused by the NWPs in the finance, insurance, real estate and business (FIREB) firms.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 20 NWPs were initially derived from the extant literature. A questionnaire survey was conducted with listed FIREB firms in Hong Kong to assess the impact of the identified NWPs on space usage. The data collected from the questionnaire survey were analysed using descriptive, explorative factor analysis (EFA) and partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the effects of NWPs on average space usage.\n\n\nFindings\nResults revealed that four major NWP factors influence average space usage. Three of these factors, namely, “flexible arrangement”, “multitasking knowledge workers” and “teamwork and communication”, influence space usage positively. Even though the effect of the fourth factor “training and networking” was significant, it does not reflect a positive influence on space usage. Business organizations can focus more on the implementation of NWPs to cushion the effects of the high cost of occupancy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research provides new knowledge to the limited literature on the effect of NWPs in FIREB firms and enriches the growing body of international literature on how today’s competitive global business organizations should revisit their workplace strategies to accommodate the rising agile workforce and NWPs. The findings offer new insights into the ongoing debate on the impact of information and communication technology-enabled NWPs on space usage. From the real estate perspective, the findings should inform policymaking towards the better planning ahead of office properties to accommodate NWPs, helping Hong Kong to remain competitive as a key financial centre.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jcre-06-2019-0030","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-06-2019-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose Many organizations in Hong Kong have witnessed a reduction in average space usage due to high occupancy costs. New working practices (NWPs) are viewed as a reform tool to manage expensive real estate around the world. However, it is unclear whether NWPs influence office space usage in business organizations in Hong Kong. This study, therefore, aims to evaluate if the average space reduction in office firms is caused by the NWPs in the finance, insurance, real estate and business (FIREB) firms. Design/methodology/approach A total of 20 NWPs were initially derived from the extant literature. A questionnaire survey was conducted with listed FIREB firms in Hong Kong to assess the impact of the identified NWPs on space usage. The data collected from the questionnaire survey were analysed using descriptive, explorative factor analysis (EFA) and partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the effects of NWPs on average space usage. Findings Results revealed that four major NWP factors influence average space usage. Three of these factors, namely, “flexible arrangement”, “multitasking knowledge workers” and “teamwork and communication”, influence space usage positively. Even though the effect of the fourth factor “training and networking” was significant, it does not reflect a positive influence on space usage. Business organizations can focus more on the implementation of NWPs to cushion the effects of the high cost of occupancy. Originality/value The research provides new knowledge to the limited literature on the effect of NWPs in FIREB firms and enriches the growing body of international literature on how today’s competitive global business organizations should revisit their workplace strategies to accommodate the rising agile workforce and NWPs. The findings offer new insights into the ongoing debate on the impact of information and communication technology-enabled NWPs on space usage. From the real estate perspective, the findings should inform policymaking towards the better planning ahead of office properties to accommodate NWPs, helping Hong Kong to remain competitive as a key financial centre.
评估香港新工作方法对办公空间使用的影响
目的由于高昂的占用成本,香港许多机构的平均空间使用量有所减少。新工作实践(NWPs)被视为管理世界各地昂贵房地产的改革工具。然而,目前尚不清楚nwp是否会影响香港商业机构的办公空间使用情况。因此,本研究旨在评估办公公司的平均空间减少是否由金融、保险、房地产和商业(FIREB)公司的NWPs引起。设计/方法学/方法共20个nwp最初是从现有文献中导出的。我们与香港的上市防火器材公司进行问卷调查,以评估已确定的新污水处理厂对空间使用的影响。采用描述性、探索性因子分析(EFA)和偏最小二乘-结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对问卷调查数据进行分析,以评估nwp对平均空间利用的影响。研究结果显示,四个主要的NWP因素影响平均空间使用。其中三个因素,即“灵活安排”、“多任务知识型员工”和“团队合作与沟通”,对空间使用有积极影响。尽管第四个因素"培训和联网"的影响很大,但它并未反映出对空间使用的积极影响。商业组织可以更多地关注nwp的实施,以缓冲高占用成本的影响。原创性/价值本研究为有限的关于nwp在FIREB公司中的影响的文献提供了新的知识,并丰富了关于当今竞争激烈的全球商业组织应如何重新审视其工作场所战略以适应不断增长的敏捷员工和nwp的国际文献。这些发现为正在进行的关于信息和通信技术支持的nwp对空间使用的影响的辩论提供了新的见解。从房地产的角度来看,研究结果应该为政策制定提供参考,以便更好地规划办公物业,以适应新农村地区,从而帮助香港保持作为主要金融中心的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信