Music Deferred: A Reappraisal of the Legacy of Pierre Schaeffer's Treatise on Musical Objects (1966)

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Susan C. Bay
{"title":"Music Deferred: A Reappraisal of the Legacy of Pierre Schaeffer's Treatise on Musical Objects (1966)","authors":"Susan C. Bay","doi":"10.1017/s1478572222000512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article reinterprets the tension between sound and music in Pierre Schaeffer's 1966 Treatise on Musical Objects. Schaeffer famously insisted that the Treatise did not address music or composition; scholars have therefore engaged with it primarily as a theoretical text on sound and listening. In this article, however, I argue that the denial and deferral of music throughout the Treatise should be considered a discrete and key part of its theoretical contributions. By the early 1960s, Schaeffer's aesthetic frustration with the practice of musique concrète had blossomed into something of an ethical imperative and paradox. He saw it necessary to suspend all musical activity in the present, so as to salvage music's future. This dynamic is key to understanding Schaeffer's controversial and influential calls for the deferral of cultural responses to sound in the Treatise, as illustrated by the practices of ‘deconditioning’ and ‘reconditioning’.","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478572222000512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reinterprets the tension between sound and music in Pierre Schaeffer's 1966 Treatise on Musical Objects. Schaeffer famously insisted that the Treatise did not address music or composition; scholars have therefore engaged with it primarily as a theoretical text on sound and listening. In this article, however, I argue that the denial and deferral of music throughout the Treatise should be considered a discrete and key part of its theoretical contributions. By the early 1960s, Schaeffer's aesthetic frustration with the practice of musique concrète had blossomed into something of an ethical imperative and paradox. He saw it necessary to suspend all musical activity in the present, so as to salvage music's future. This dynamic is key to understanding Schaeffer's controversial and influential calls for the deferral of cultural responses to sound in the Treatise, as illustrated by the practices of ‘deconditioning’ and ‘reconditioning’.
推迟的音乐:重新评价皮埃尔·谢弗的《音乐对象论》(1966)的遗产
本文重新诠释了Pierre Schaeffer 1966年的《论音乐对象》(Treatise on Musical Objects)中声音与音乐之间的张力。著名的是,谢弗坚持认为《人性论》不涉及音乐或作曲;因此,学者们主要将其作为关于声音和听力的理论文本。然而,在这篇文章中,我认为在《人性论》中对音乐的否定和推迟应该被视为其理论贡献的一个离散和关键部分。到20世纪60年代初,谢弗对具体音乐实践的审美挫折已经发展成为一种道德上的要求和悖论。他认为有必要暂时停止一切音乐活动,以挽救音乐的未来。这种动态是理解Schaeffer在《人学论》中有争议和有影响力的呼吁,即延迟文化对声音的反应的关键,正如“去条件化”和“再条件化”的实践所说明的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信