Erector spinae plane block for cancer pain – A scoping review of current evidence

Indubala Maurya, R. Saxena, R. Maurya
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block for cancer pain – A scoping review of current evidence","authors":"Indubala Maurya, R. Saxena, R. Maurya","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_54_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancer patients experience pain secondary to the disease process or due to treatment. Refractory cancer pain can present a clinical challenge for pain physicians, which significantly affects patients' quality of life and increases disability. Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks have rapidly been used in both acute and chronic pain practice. However, the use of ESP block for cancer pain management remains unclear. Thus, we conducted this scoping review to perform a comprehensive overview of current evidence on ESP block for cancer pain management. We searched the PubMed and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles published between January 2016 and March 2023 using the keywords “erector spinae plane block,” “ESP block,” and “cancer pain”. After excluding duplicate and irrelevant articles, we included a total of 26 studies, which were case reports, case series, cohort studies, and randomized control trials. Both neurolytic and non-neurolytic ESP blocks were used for cancer pain. The ESP blocks were performed in all patients with severe pain (Visual Analog Score or Numerical Rating Scale >7) and the majority of cases had some degree of pain relief. None of the studies has reported any serious complications related to procedure or drug used. There was heterogeneity in the type of drug, volume, and concentration used for ESP block. A definitive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of ESP block in cancer pain management was not possible. The current literature suggests that the ESP block can be helpful in cancer pain management. However, caution must be exercised not to overestimate the safety of either neurolytic or non-neurolytic ESP block as 88% (n = 23) of included studies were either case reports or case series. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety of ESP block in cancer pain management.s","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"74 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_54_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer patients experience pain secondary to the disease process or due to treatment. Refractory cancer pain can present a clinical challenge for pain physicians, which significantly affects patients' quality of life and increases disability. Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks have rapidly been used in both acute and chronic pain practice. However, the use of ESP block for cancer pain management remains unclear. Thus, we conducted this scoping review to perform a comprehensive overview of current evidence on ESP block for cancer pain management. We searched the PubMed and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles published between January 2016 and March 2023 using the keywords “erector spinae plane block,” “ESP block,” and “cancer pain”. After excluding duplicate and irrelevant articles, we included a total of 26 studies, which were case reports, case series, cohort studies, and randomized control trials. Both neurolytic and non-neurolytic ESP blocks were used for cancer pain. The ESP blocks were performed in all patients with severe pain (Visual Analog Score or Numerical Rating Scale >7) and the majority of cases had some degree of pain relief. None of the studies has reported any serious complications related to procedure or drug used. There was heterogeneity in the type of drug, volume, and concentration used for ESP block. A definitive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of ESP block in cancer pain management was not possible. The current literature suggests that the ESP block can be helpful in cancer pain management. However, caution must be exercised not to overestimate the safety of either neurolytic or non-neurolytic ESP block as 88% (n = 23) of included studies were either case reports or case series. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety of ESP block in cancer pain management.s
直立脊柱平面阻滞治疗癌性疼痛-当前证据的范围综述
癌症患者经历的疼痛继发于疾病过程或由于治疗。难治性癌性疼痛对疼痛医生来说是一个临床挑战,它显著影响患者的生活质量并增加残疾。竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞已迅速应用于急性和慢性疼痛的实践。然而,ESP阻滞在癌症疼痛管理中的应用仍不清楚。因此,我们进行了这一范围审查,对目前关于ESP阻滞治疗癌症疼痛的证据进行了全面的概述。我们检索了PubMed和谷歌Scholar数据库,检索了2016年1月至2023年3月期间发表的相关文章,关键词为“直立脊柱平面阻滞”、“ESP阻滞”和“癌症疼痛”。在排除重复和不相关的文章后,我们共纳入了26项研究,包括病例报告、病例系列、队列研究和随机对照试验。神经性和非神经性ESP阻滞均用于治疗癌性疼痛。所有有严重疼痛的患者(视觉模拟评分或数值评定量表bbb70)都进行了ESP阻滞,大多数病例都有一定程度的疼痛缓解。没有一项研究报告与手术或药物使用有关的严重并发症。用于ESP阻滞的药物类型、体积和浓度存在异质性。关于ESP阻滞在癌症疼痛管理中的有效性和安全性的明确结论是不可能的。目前的文献表明,ESP阻滞可以帮助癌症疼痛管理。然而,必须谨慎,不要高估神经溶解性或非神经溶解性ESP阻滞的安全性,因为88% (n = 23)的纳入研究要么是病例报告,要么是病例系列。需要随机对照临床试验来确定ESP阻滞治疗癌症疼痛的有效性和安全性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信