Indigenous views on the future of public archaeology in Australia

Q3 Arts and Humanities

AP Arqueologia Publica Pub Date : 2021-03-21 DOI:10.23914/AP.V10I0.293

K. Pollard, Claire Smith, Jasmine Willika, V. Copley, V. Copley, Christopher Willson, Emily Poelina-Hunter, Julie Ah Quee

{"title":"Indigenous views on the future of public archaeology in Australia","authors":"K. Pollard, Claire Smith, Jasmine Willika, V. Copley, V. Copley, Christopher Willson, Emily Poelina-Hunter, Julie Ah Quee","doi":"10.23914/AP.V10I0.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper was written in response to a request by the editors of the AP: Online Journal of Public Archaeology, Jaime Almansa Sánchez and Elena Papagiannopoulou, for Claire Smith to write on the future of public archaeology in Australia In Australia, public archaeology focusses on high profile colonial sites such as The Rocks in Sydney (Karskens 1999) and Port Arthur in Tasmania (Steele et al 2007;Frew 2012), tourism (e g Cole and Wallis 2019) or enhancing school curricula (Nichols et al 2005;Owens and Steele 2005) However, given her decades-long relationships with Jawoyn and Ngadjuri people (Smith 1999;Smith et al 2016;Smith et al 2020), Claire Smith decided that a useful way of approaching this topic would be to obtain Indigenous views on the subject Accordingly, she contacted the Aboriginal co-authors of this article and invited them to co-author the paper The possibility to write in free form was a boon The ‘conversation’ format we settled on was designed to facilitate the voices of individuals, to present a range of Indigenous views, to allow people to express their views frankly, and to deal with the constraints of people being located in different parts of Australia as well as occasional lock-downs due to COVID-19 We decided on five topics/questions that would be the basis of the conversation Each Aboriginal author gave their views either by email or by phone These views were interwoven into a ‘conversation’ The language has been edited lightly for clarity and to simulate a real-life conversation The final text was approved by all authors © 2020, LAP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology All Rights Reserved","PeriodicalId":37365,"journal":{"name":"AP Arqueologia Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AP Arqueologia Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23914/AP.V10I0.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper was written in response to a request by the editors of the AP: Online Journal of Public Archaeology, Jaime Almansa Sánchez and Elena Papagiannopoulou, for Claire Smith to write on the future of public archaeology in Australia In Australia, public archaeology focusses on high profile colonial sites such as The Rocks in Sydney (Karskens 1999) and Port Arthur in Tasmania (Steele et al 2007;Frew 2012), tourism (e g Cole and Wallis 2019) or enhancing school curricula (Nichols et al 2005;Owens and Steele 2005) However, given her decades-long relationships with Jawoyn and Ngadjuri people (Smith 1999;Smith et al 2016;Smith et al 2020), Claire Smith decided that a useful way of approaching this topic would be to obtain Indigenous views on the subject Accordingly, she contacted the Aboriginal co-authors of this article and invited them to co-author the paper The possibility to write in free form was a boon The ‘conversation’ format we settled on was designed to facilitate the voices of individuals, to present a range of Indigenous views, to allow people to express their views frankly, and to deal with the constraints of people being located in different parts of Australia as well as occasional lock-downs due to COVID-19 We decided on five topics/questions that would be the basis of the conversation Each Aboriginal author gave their views either by email or by phone These views were interwoven into a ‘conversation’ The language has been edited lightly for clarity and to simulate a real-life conversation The final text was approved by all authors © 2020, LAP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology All Rights Reserved

查看原文本刊更多论文

土著人对澳大利亚公共考古未来的看法

本文是应美联社编辑的要求而写的:公共考古学在线杂志，Jaime Almansa Sánchez和Elena Papagiannopoulou，为Claire Smith撰写关于澳大利亚公共考古学的未来在澳大利亚，公共考古学专注于高调的殖民遗址，如悉尼的岩石(Karskens 1999)和塔斯马尼亚的亚瑟港(Steele等人2007;Frew 2012)，旅游业(例如Cole和Wallis 2019)或加强学校课程(Nichols等人2005;Owens和Steele 2005)。考虑到她与Jawoyn和Ngadjuri人长达数十年的关系(Smith 1999;Smith et al 2016;Smith et al 2020)，克莱尔·史密斯(Claire Smith)认为，处理这一主题的有效方法是获取土著对这一主题的看法。因此，她联系了本文的土著合著者，并邀请他们共同撰写论文。以自由形式写作的可能性是一种福音，我们确定的“对话”形式旨在促进个人的声音。提出一系列土著人的观点，让人们坦率地表达自己的观点，和处理约束的人位于澳大利亚的不同部分以及偶尔锁定由于COVID-19五个主题/问题,我们决定将谈话的基础上每个土著给作者自己的观点通过电子邮件或电话这些观点交织成一个“谈话”的语言编辑轻了清晰和模拟一个真实的对话最终文本经所有作者©2020,腿上:公共考古在线期刊版权所有

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

AP Arqueologia Publica Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal devoted exclusively to Public Archaeology. Edited by JAS Arqueología, it is freely distributed online in order to enable easy access to research and debates, and to spread the growing realm that is starting to settle into everyday archaeological practice. The aim of this journal is to explore the multiple relations between Archaeology and Society. Archaeology is generally understood as the study of past societies from their remains, and Public Archaeology is the study of the relations between Archaeology and Society in every aspect of daily life (social, economic and political). We are talking about the present of Archaeology and the different issues that surround and affect it. Below is a list of key topics covered: -The economic and political impact of Archaeology. -Archaeology as Popular Culture. -The history and development of Archaeology as a professional activity. -Theoretical issues around the publicity of Archaeology. -The image of Archaeology. -Legal issues affecting archaeological practice and the illicit trade of antiquities. -The presentation of Archaeology to the public. Of course, this is not an exhaustive list of topics, which is why the criteria for the preliminary selection of papers are subject to the topic. This journal has been created with the desire to become a reference in the field of Public Archaeology. Therefore, we encourage all of you working within the realm of Public Archaeology to share your thoughts, experiences and ideas in this open medium for the development of Public Archaeology.