Pattern of Drug Information Sources Utilized by Medical Practitioners at A Teaching Hospital in Nepal

Pravin Prasad, Naresh Karki, K. Kandel, Shruti Shah, Vitasta Muskan, R. Ghimire, A. Mudvari, P. Gyanwali
{"title":"Pattern of Drug Information Sources Utilized by Medical Practitioners at A Teaching Hospital in Nepal","authors":"Pravin Prasad, Naresh Karki, K. Kandel, Shruti Shah, Vitasta Muskan, R. Ghimire, A. Mudvari, P. Gyanwali","doi":"10.3126/mjsbh.v21i2.40323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The development of pharmaceutical industry has been adding new knowledge about drugs continuously making it difficult to remember each piece of information. The physicians need to be supplemented with new information using various unbiased and reliable drug information (DI) sources which will promote rationale use of medicines. This study aims to understand the commonly used sources of DI by prescribers at our institute, their usefulness and the need for an independent drug information unit at the institute.\nMethods: A cross-sectional descriptive study that included all prescribers presently working at this institute and actively involved in patient care was conducted. Consenting participants were requested to fill in the self-administered questionnaire. Data thus collected were entered using EpiData version 3.1 and were analysed using SPSS version 18.\nResults: Filled-in questionnaires were obtained from 147 prescribers. Almost all of the participants (95.80%) used textbooks and Online Medical Sites (OMS) as sources of DI. Among participants using OMS for DI, 80 (58.39%) classified them as sometimes biased. Less than half (41.25%) agreed that they will absolutely be benefitted from having unbiased DI services at the hospital. The participants most commonly (136, 92.50%) had queries related to dosage / administration on a daily basis.\nConclusions: Most prescribers relied on textbooks and OMS for DI which in their opinion had some level of biasness associated with them. They also agreed on the need of independent DI services in the institution to support prescription practices.","PeriodicalId":33963,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v21i2.40323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The development of pharmaceutical industry has been adding new knowledge about drugs continuously making it difficult to remember each piece of information. The physicians need to be supplemented with new information using various unbiased and reliable drug information (DI) sources which will promote rationale use of medicines. This study aims to understand the commonly used sources of DI by prescribers at our institute, their usefulness and the need for an independent drug information unit at the institute. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study that included all prescribers presently working at this institute and actively involved in patient care was conducted. Consenting participants were requested to fill in the self-administered questionnaire. Data thus collected were entered using EpiData version 3.1 and were analysed using SPSS version 18. Results: Filled-in questionnaires were obtained from 147 prescribers. Almost all of the participants (95.80%) used textbooks and Online Medical Sites (OMS) as sources of DI. Among participants using OMS for DI, 80 (58.39%) classified them as sometimes biased. Less than half (41.25%) agreed that they will absolutely be benefitted from having unbiased DI services at the hospital. The participants most commonly (136, 92.50%) had queries related to dosage / administration on a daily basis. Conclusions: Most prescribers relied on textbooks and OMS for DI which in their opinion had some level of biasness associated with them. They also agreed on the need of independent DI services in the institution to support prescription practices.
尼泊尔某教学医院执业医师利用药物信息源的模式
引言:制药行业的发展不断增加有关药物的新知识,使人们很难记住每一条信息。医生需要使用各种公正可靠的药物信息(DI)来源获得新的信息,以促进药物的合理使用。本研究旨在了解我们研究所处方医生常用的DI来源、它们的有用性以及研究所建立独立药物信息单位的必要性。方法:进行了一项横断面描述性研究,包括目前在该研究所工作并积极参与患者护理的所有处方医生。同意的参与者被要求填写自填问卷。由此收集的数据使用EpiData 3.1版输入,并使用SPSS 18版进行分析。结果:从147名处方医生那里获得了填写的问卷。几乎所有的参与者(95.80%)都使用教科书和在线医疗网站(OMS)作为DI的来源。在使用OMS进行DI的参与者中,80人(58.39%)认为他们有时有偏见。不到一半(41.25%)的人认为,在医院提供公正的DI服务绝对会让他们受益。最常见的参与者(136人,92.50%)每天都有与剂量/给药有关的问题。结论:大多数处方医生依赖课本和OMS进行DI,在他们看来,这与他们有一定程度的偏见。他们还一致认为,该机构需要独立的DI服务来支持处方实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信