Minimal clinically important difference is lower for carpal tunnel syndrome patients undergoing injection versus surgery

Verena J M M Schrier, R. Gelfman, P. Amadio
{"title":"Minimal clinically important difference is lower for carpal tunnel syndrome patients undergoing injection versus surgery","authors":"Verena J M M Schrier, R. Gelfman, P. Amadio","doi":"10.1177/1753193419871631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and none required physical therapy. One patient reported mild pain at the base of the ipsilateral 5th metacarpal up to 9 months postoperatively. The others reported prompt and complete resolution of preoperative pain, noted no functional deficits or wrist weakness, were satisfied with the procedure, and to our knowledge, have not had any late complications. We believe that lengthening the ECU decreases tension in the tendon, which relieves painful stenosis or subluxation. Painless postoperative subluxation may occur. Subluxation or stenosis might be eliminated altogether by performing an ECU tenotomy (Figure 1(d)). However, the senior author favours lengthening over tenotomy to preserve some ECU function, in case the ECU should be called on as a donor tendon in the future, and because patients may be averse to a procedure that definitively eliminates the function of a body part. We recognize that neither of these potential benefits have been subjected to objective assessment. A prospective study including outcome measures is in order to determine the precise indications and efficacy of ECU lengthening.","PeriodicalId":73762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753193419871631","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419871631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

and none required physical therapy. One patient reported mild pain at the base of the ipsilateral 5th metacarpal up to 9 months postoperatively. The others reported prompt and complete resolution of preoperative pain, noted no functional deficits or wrist weakness, were satisfied with the procedure, and to our knowledge, have not had any late complications. We believe that lengthening the ECU decreases tension in the tendon, which relieves painful stenosis or subluxation. Painless postoperative subluxation may occur. Subluxation or stenosis might be eliminated altogether by performing an ECU tenotomy (Figure 1(d)). However, the senior author favours lengthening over tenotomy to preserve some ECU function, in case the ECU should be called on as a donor tendon in the future, and because patients may be averse to a procedure that definitively eliminates the function of a body part. We recognize that neither of these potential benefits have been subjected to objective assessment. A prospective study including outcome measures is in order to determine the precise indications and efficacy of ECU lengthening.
腕管综合征患者接受注射与手术的最小临床重要差异较低
没有人需要物理治疗。1例患者术后9个月伴有同侧第5掌骨基部轻度疼痛。其他报告术前疼痛的及时和完全解决,没有功能缺陷或手腕无力,对手术满意,据我们所知,没有任何晚期并发症。我们认为延长ECU可以减少肌腱的张力,从而缓解疼痛的狭窄或半脱位。术后可能发生无痛半脱位。行ECU肌腱切开术可完全消除半脱位或狭窄(图1(d))。然而,这位资深作者倾向于延长而不是肌腱切开,以保留ECU的一些功能,以防将来ECU需要作为供体肌腱,并且因为患者可能会反对明确消除身体部位功能的手术。我们认识到,这些潜在的好处都没有得到客观的评价。一项包括结果测量的前瞻性研究是为了确定ECU延长的确切适应症和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信