Some Afterward Remarks

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Chunyan Ning
{"title":"Some Afterward Remarks","authors":"Chunyan Ning","doi":"10.1163/23526416-bja10039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nScience, substantially different from technology and engineering, is to give explanations for why-questions about the Nature, and science of language is to give explanations for why-question about the part of the Nature Noam Chomsky has circumscribed as fl and I-language. His current talk reinforces the conceptual necessity of the separation of the system of thought from externalization, and offers explanations for some in-depth questions concerning with the basic properties of human language, by virtue of a stronger version of smt. In these remarks I present my understanding of the ideas encoded in his development of smt, and tentative solutions to some of the unsolved problems or mysteries.","PeriodicalId":52227,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semantics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science, substantially different from technology and engineering, is to give explanations for why-questions about the Nature, and science of language is to give explanations for why-question about the part of the Nature Noam Chomsky has circumscribed as fl and I-language. His current talk reinforces the conceptual necessity of the separation of the system of thought from externalization, and offers explanations for some in-depth questions concerning with the basic properties of human language, by virtue of a stronger version of smt. In these remarks I present my understanding of the ideas encoded in his development of smt, and tentative solutions to some of the unsolved problems or mysteries.
一些事后评论
科学,本质上不同于技术和工程,是对关于自然的“为什么”问题的解释,而语言科学是对诺姆·乔姆斯基所界定的“自然”部分的“为什么”问题的解释。他目前的演讲强调了思想系统与外化分离的概念必要性,并借助一个更强大的smt版本,对有关人类语言基本属性的一些深层次问题提供了解释。在这些评论中,我介绍了我对他发展smt的思想的理解,以及对一些尚未解决的问题或谜团的初步解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Semantics
Cognitive Semantics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信