[Validation of an intervention to strengthen nursing students' self-careValidado de uma intervengo para fortalecer o autocuidado em estudantes de enfermagem].

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Revista Cuidarte Pub Date : 2023-09-03 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI:10.15649/cuidarte.2540
Moises Alfonso Bravo-Gomez, Leidy Yemile Vargas-Rodríguez, Marcela Arenas-Cardenas, Mauricio Lopez-Solano, Raquel Rivera-Carvajal
{"title":"[Validation of an intervention to strengthen nursing students' self-careValidado de uma intervengo para fortalecer o autocuidado em estudantes de enfermagem].","authors":"Moises Alfonso Bravo-Gomez, Leidy Yemile Vargas-Rodríguez, Marcela Arenas-Cardenas, Mauricio Lopez-Solano, Raquel Rivera-Carvajal","doi":"10.15649/cuidarte.2540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-care is one of the concepts to be strengthened in future nurses from a learner centered education perspective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the validation of an educational strategy through both experts and the target population judgment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The research followed a convergent parallel sequential mixed qualitative-quantitative approach. In the qualitative phase, analysis of lexical similarities and hermeneutic phenomenological analysis was carried out with six students. The quantitative phase included opinions from ten experts; CVI and arithmetic mean were calculated to assess pertinence, coherence, relevance, and clarity. The Brennan-Prediger coefficient was used for measuring agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relationships between action inducement and introspection of self-care behaviors are identified. Overall CVI was 0.96, with a mean of 3.7±0.4. Regarding agreement, the item 'specific objectives' was the one that showed a p-value of 0.054 and a coefficient of 0.37. Concerning clarity, the lowest mean (3.4±0.8) and CVI (0.8) values were observed. The remaining items have a p-value >0.05.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In validating the educational intervention by the experts, a content validity index was obtained with values higher than desirable. This result is similar to that reported by other authors whose information was rated as sufficient and necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The educational intervention has the criteria for content validity according to both experts and the target population, as manifested by the reflection on the transformation of some self-care behaviors in nursing students.</p>","PeriodicalId":43234,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cuidarte","volume":" ","pages":"e04"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cuidarte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Self-care is one of the concepts to be strengthened in future nurses from a learner centered education perspective.

Objective: To estimate the validation of an educational strategy through both experts and the target population judgment.

Materials and methods: The research followed a convergent parallel sequential mixed qualitative-quantitative approach. In the qualitative phase, analysis of lexical similarities and hermeneutic phenomenological analysis was carried out with six students. The quantitative phase included opinions from ten experts; CVI and arithmetic mean were calculated to assess pertinence, coherence, relevance, and clarity. The Brennan-Prediger coefficient was used for measuring agreement.

Results: Relationships between action inducement and introspection of self-care behaviors are identified. Overall CVI was 0.96, with a mean of 3.7±0.4. Regarding agreement, the item 'specific objectives' was the one that showed a p-value of 0.054 and a coefficient of 0.37. Concerning clarity, the lowest mean (3.4±0.8) and CVI (0.8) values were observed. The remaining items have a p-value >0.05.

Discussion: In validating the educational intervention by the experts, a content validity index was obtained with values higher than desirable. This result is similar to that reported by other authors whose information was rated as sufficient and necessary.

Conclusion: The educational intervention has the criteria for content validity according to both experts and the target population, as manifested by the reflection on the transformation of some self-care behaviors in nursing students.

加强护生自我护理干预的有效性
亮点:生命护理是护理专业的中心,但在照顾他人之前,这一过程必须从自我护理过程开始。教育策略的使用大大有助于学习以接受、认同和诱导生活方式本身转变为导向的知识。基于问题学习的教育策略将学生置于真实的环境和位置,在那里他们重申了他们对个人和集体问题的知识和行动。专家和目标人群的验证从教育干预的定性和定量特征出发,提出了一个广泛的观点。导言:自以学徒为中心的培训以来,自我护理是未来护理专业人员应加强的概念之一。目的:通过专家和目标人群的判断,评估教育策略的有效性。材料和方法:该研究是在一种混合方法下进行的,该方法是串行并行收敛的。在定性阶段,6名学生进行了相似性和现象学解释学的词汇分析。定量阶段由10名专家判断,计算IVC和人工平均值以获得相关性、一致性、相关性和清晰度,并使用布伦南和预测测试进行一致性。结果:确定了行动诱导与自我照顾行为反思之间的关系。总IVC为0.96,平均为3.7±0.4。与此相对应的是“具体目标”项目的p值为0.054,coef=0.37,平均分(3.4±0.8)和IVC(0.8)的得分最低,其余项目的p值>0.05讨论:在教育干预法官的验证中,获得了一个值高于预期的内容有效性指数,这与其他作者的报告相似,在这些报告中,对信息的评估是充分和必要的。结论:教育干预被认为具有专家法官和目标人群对内容验证的标准,体现在对护生某些自我照顾行为转变的反思上。引用这篇文章:布拉沃·戈麦斯·莫伊斯·阿方索、巴尔加斯·罗德里格斯·莱迪·耶米尔、阿里纳斯·卡德纳斯·尤里·马塞拉、洛佩斯·索拉诺·毛里西奥、里维拉·卡瓦哈尔·拉奎尔。加强护生自我护理干预措施的验证。杂志照顾你。2023年;14(2):E2540http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2540
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Cuidarte
Revista Cuidarte NURSING-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信