Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Children: A Prospective Single-Center Analysis of Associated Complications

Q3 Medicine
F. Tavares, Maria AlBandari, J. Donnellan
{"title":"Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Children: A Prospective Single-Center Analysis of Associated Complications","authors":"F. Tavares, Maria AlBandari, J. Donnellan","doi":"10.2309/java-d-20-00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Objective: To assess performance of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in pediatric patients Design: Prospective observational study\n Setting: Academic pediatric tertiary referral center\n Study Population: Children aged less than 18 years with PICCs inserted in Interventional Radiology from January 2019 to June 2019\n Outcome Measures: Number of catheters remaining in situ until completion of intended therapy; and for those removed prematurely, the type and rate of complications\n Results: A total of 88 PICCs (40 uncuffed, 48 cuffed) were inserted in 77 children. Overall, 72% (n = 63) of all catheters remained in situ until intended therapy was completed. Complications resulting in premature removal occurred in 24% of catheters (rate of 3.89/1000 catheter-days). Complications included catheter malfunction (2.04 per 1000 catheter-days), infection (1.67 per 1000 catheter-days), and thrombosis (0.18 per 1000 catheter-days). Complications were further recorded by catheter type. In patients with uncuffed catheters, the overall complication rate was observed to be 6.74 per 1000 catheter-days. In patients with cuffed catheters, the overall complication rate was observed to be 1.10 per 1000 catheter-days.\n Conclusions: Findings suggest that cuffed PICCs may provide additional benefits toward optimizing catheter performance and securement in neonatal and pediatric patients. This can contribute to improved likelihood of complication-free PICC therapy and successful therapy completion. Pediatric patients present unique challenges and considerations for clinicians planning PICC therapy. Additional studies are needed to identify effective strategies to mitigate catheter failure in neonatal and pediatric populations.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-20-00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess performance of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in pediatric patients Design: Prospective observational study Setting: Academic pediatric tertiary referral center Study Population: Children aged less than 18 years with PICCs inserted in Interventional Radiology from January 2019 to June 2019 Outcome Measures: Number of catheters remaining in situ until completion of intended therapy; and for those removed prematurely, the type and rate of complications Results: A total of 88 PICCs (40 uncuffed, 48 cuffed) were inserted in 77 children. Overall, 72% (n = 63) of all catheters remained in situ until intended therapy was completed. Complications resulting in premature removal occurred in 24% of catheters (rate of 3.89/1000 catheter-days). Complications included catheter malfunction (2.04 per 1000 catheter-days), infection (1.67 per 1000 catheter-days), and thrombosis (0.18 per 1000 catheter-days). Complications were further recorded by catheter type. In patients with uncuffed catheters, the overall complication rate was observed to be 6.74 per 1000 catheter-days. In patients with cuffed catheters, the overall complication rate was observed to be 1.10 per 1000 catheter-days. Conclusions: Findings suggest that cuffed PICCs may provide additional benefits toward optimizing catheter performance and securement in neonatal and pediatric patients. This can contribute to improved likelihood of complication-free PICC therapy and successful therapy completion. Pediatric patients present unique challenges and considerations for clinicians planning PICC therapy. Additional studies are needed to identify effective strategies to mitigate catheter failure in neonatal and pediatric populations.
儿童外周置入中心导管相关并发症的前瞻性单中心分析
目的:评估外周置入中心导管(PICCs)在儿科患者中的作用设计:前瞻性观察研究环境:学术儿科三级转诊中心研究人群:2019年1月至2019年6月在介入放射学中置入PICCs的年龄小于18岁的儿童。结果:77例患儿共植入picc 88枚(未带箍40枚,带箍48枚)。总的来说,72% (n = 63)的导管留在原位直到预期的治疗完成。早产拔管并发症发生率为24%(3.89/1000导管日)。并发症包括导管故障(2.04 / 1000导管天)、感染(1.67 / 1000导管天)和血栓形成(0.18 / 1000导管天)。根据导管类型进一步记录并发症。在使用无套管导管的患者中,观察到的总并发症发生率为6.74 / 1000导管天。在使用袖珍导管的患者中,观察到的总并发症发生率为1.10 / 1000导管天。结论:研究结果表明,在优化新生儿和儿科患者的导管性能和安全性方面,加箍PICCs可能提供额外的好处。这有助于提高无并发症PICC治疗和成功完成治疗的可能性。儿科患者为临床医生规划PICC治疗提出了独特的挑战和考虑因素。需要进一步的研究来确定有效的策略来减轻新生儿和儿科人群的导管失效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信