The Extent, Dynamics, and Potential Predictors of Technical Efficiency and Capacity Utilisation in Small-Scale Fisheries in Oman

Q3 Environmental Science
M. Al-Siyabi, S. Bose, H. Al-Masroori
{"title":"The Extent, Dynamics, and Potential Predictors of Technical Efficiency and Capacity Utilisation in Small-Scale Fisheries in Oman","authors":"M. Al-Siyabi, S. Bose, H. Al-Masroori","doi":"10.33997/J.AFS.2021.34.1.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the extent, dynamics, and factors influencing technical efficiency (TE) and capacity utilisation (CU) in small-scale fisheries (SSF) using a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach covering the period 2010–2012. A considerable extent of boat-level technical inefficiency, capacity underutilisation and scale inefficiency were evident. On average, TE and CU levels under the constant returns to scale (CRS) and variable returns to scale (VRS) models declined over time. The TE and CU scores of 2010 remained unaltered with the addition of ‘fishing time’ as an input to the model. The proportion of boats with unitary scale efficiency (SE) decreased from 26 % in 2010 to 12 % in 2012. The underutilisation rates of the inputs ‘crew’ and ‘fishing time’ ranged from 15.5 % to 31.6 % and 15.8 % to 28.6 %, respectively. Among the species category, the extent of excess capacity was 70 % to 156 % and 47 % to 119 % under the CRS and VRS models, respectively. The second-stage DEA results indicated that the explanatory variables ‘fishing location’, ‘catch per unit of effort’ (CPUE), ‘fuel costs’ and ‘crew share’ significantly influenced CU under the CRS model. In contrast, the significant influence of subsidies and other operating costs were noted under the VRS model. For the TE case, ‘age’, ‘education’, ‘subsidy’ and ‘CPUE’ were found to be significant under the CRS and VRS models. Other significant variables were found in the study under CRS and VRS models. Finally, the results from the descriptive and empirical analysis under the two-stage DEA model are discussed together with policy implications.","PeriodicalId":37296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Fisheries Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33997/J.AFS.2021.34.1.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper investigates the extent, dynamics, and factors influencing technical efficiency (TE) and capacity utilisation (CU) in small-scale fisheries (SSF) using a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach covering the period 2010–2012. A considerable extent of boat-level technical inefficiency, capacity underutilisation and scale inefficiency were evident. On average, TE and CU levels under the constant returns to scale (CRS) and variable returns to scale (VRS) models declined over time. The TE and CU scores of 2010 remained unaltered with the addition of ‘fishing time’ as an input to the model. The proportion of boats with unitary scale efficiency (SE) decreased from 26 % in 2010 to 12 % in 2012. The underutilisation rates of the inputs ‘crew’ and ‘fishing time’ ranged from 15.5 % to 31.6 % and 15.8 % to 28.6 %, respectively. Among the species category, the extent of excess capacity was 70 % to 156 % and 47 % to 119 % under the CRS and VRS models, respectively. The second-stage DEA results indicated that the explanatory variables ‘fishing location’, ‘catch per unit of effort’ (CPUE), ‘fuel costs’ and ‘crew share’ significantly influenced CU under the CRS model. In contrast, the significant influence of subsidies and other operating costs were noted under the VRS model. For the TE case, ‘age’, ‘education’, ‘subsidy’ and ‘CPUE’ were found to be significant under the CRS and VRS models. Other significant variables were found in the study under CRS and VRS models. Finally, the results from the descriptive and empirical analysis under the two-stage DEA model are discussed together with policy implications.
阿曼小规模渔业技术效率和能力利用的程度、动态和潜在预测因素
本文采用两阶段数据包络分析(DEA)方法,研究了2010-2012年期间小规模渔业技术效率(TE)和产能利用率(CU)的影响程度、动态和因素。船级技术效率低下、产能利用不足和规模效率低下的程度相当明显。平均而言,恒定规模回报率(CRS)和可变规模回报率模型下的TE和CU水平随着时间的推移而下降。2010年的TE和CU得分保持不变,增加了“捕鱼时间”作为模型的输入。具有单一规模效率(SE)的船只比例从2010年的26%下降到2012年的12%。投入“船员”和“捕鱼时间”的未充分利用率分别为15.5%至31.6%和15.8%至28.6%。在物种类别中,CRS和VRS模型下的超额容量分别为70%至156%和47%至119%。第二阶段DEA结果表明,在CRS模型下,解释变量“捕鱼地点”、“单位努力渔获量”、“燃料成本”和“船员份额”显著影响CU。相比之下,在VRS模型下注意到补贴和其他运营成本的重大影响。对于TE案例,在CRS和VRS模型下,“年龄”、“教育程度”、“补贴”和“CPUE”被发现是显著的。在CRS和VRS模型下的研究中发现了其他重要变量。最后,讨论了两阶段DEA模型下的描述性和实证分析结果以及政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Fisheries Science
Asian Fisheries Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Asian Fisheries Science (AFS) was first published in 1987. It is an open access SCOPUS indexed publication of the Asian Fisheries Society. Four regular issues are published annually in March, June, September and December. In addition, special issues are published on specific topics. Full texts of the articles are available for free download and there is no publication fee. The journal promotes fisheries science which has an international appeal with special focus on Asian interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信