Generøsitetens teologi

Q4 Arts and Humanities
N. Gregersen
{"title":"Generøsitetens teologi","authors":"N. Gregersen","doi":"10.7146/dtt.v71i2.138270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"„A Theology of Generosity“, aims to reinterpret the doctrine of grace in the light of postmodern discussions on gift and giving. It is argued that the idea of a divine-human reciprocity is already entailed in the Old Testament term berakah (blessing/thanking) as well as in the New Testament concepts of eulogéo (blessing/praising) and cháris (grace). The concept of reciprocity, however, is in need of a phenomenological clarification. Three conditions for a suitable concept of divine generosity and giving are identified: (1) God must be able to carry the risk of being the first donor without receiving returns; the almighty God is not in need of returns. (2) Grace should not be seen as mere object; rather the self-giving God is present in the gift of grace. (3) The God-human relation should not be conceived of as merely a bilateral relation (with immediate or postponed counter-gifts); rather the grace of God facilitates a wider circulation of gifts. With the gift of grace, human beings receive an impulse to pass on the gifts of grace to other creatures within a multilateral network of giving and receiving. Never, however, should the human ability to do so be seen as a condition for divine generosity.","PeriodicalId":38473,"journal":{"name":"Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/dtt.v71i2.138270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

„A Theology of Generosity“, aims to reinterpret the doctrine of grace in the light of postmodern discussions on gift and giving. It is argued that the idea of a divine-human reciprocity is already entailed in the Old Testament term berakah (blessing/thanking) as well as in the New Testament concepts of eulogéo (blessing/praising) and cháris (grace). The concept of reciprocity, however, is in need of a phenomenological clarification. Three conditions for a suitable concept of divine generosity and giving are identified: (1) God must be able to carry the risk of being the first donor without receiving returns; the almighty God is not in need of returns. (2) Grace should not be seen as mere object; rather the self-giving God is present in the gift of grace. (3) The God-human relation should not be conceived of as merely a bilateral relation (with immediate or postponed counter-gifts); rather the grace of God facilitates a wider circulation of gifts. With the gift of grace, human beings receive an impulse to pass on the gifts of grace to other creatures within a multilateral network of giving and receiving. Never, however, should the human ability to do so be seen as a condition for divine generosity.
慷慨神学
“慷慨的神学”,旨在重新解释恩典的教义在后现代的讨论礼物和给予。有人认为,神与人相互作用的概念已经包含在旧约术语berakah(祝福/感谢)以及新约概念eulog(祝福/赞美)和cháris(恩典)中。然而,互惠的概念需要一个现象学上的澄清。确定了神的慷慨和给予的合适概念的三个条件:(1)神必须能够承担成为第一个捐赠者而不获得回报的风险;全能的上帝不需要回报。(2)恩典不应被视为纯粹的对象;相反,自我奉献的上帝是在恩典的礼物中出现的。(3)神与人的关系不应被视为仅仅是一种双边关系(有立即或延迟的反礼物);相反,上帝的恩典促进了礼物更广泛的流通。有了恩典的恩赐,人类在一个给予和接受的多边网络中,得到了一种将恩典的恩赐传递给其他生物的冲动。然而,人类这样做的能力绝不应该被看作是神慷慨的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift
Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信