Audit of Financial Reporting Documents: Analysis of Process of Determining Materiality

Gerda Jurkonienė, Justina Stašaitytė
{"title":"Audit of Financial Reporting Documents: Analysis of Process of Determining Materiality","authors":"Gerda Jurkonienė, Justina Stašaitytė","doi":"10.15388/batp.2019.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During audit of the financial statements of companies, the auditors use a certain level of materiality to determine both the scope of the procedures and the impact of errors on the representation of the true and fair view of the financial statements. International auditing standards leave wide range of possibilities for interpretation of the materiality process, which often raises the question of how the auditor determines materiality. The purpose of the study is to analyze the materiality process and to create a model of the materiality determination process. Methods of information gathering, comparative analysis, critical evaluation, systematization and interpretation of scientific literature and normative acts of audit are used in this article. After analyzing the materiality determination process, it was found that the materiality process consists of four steps: assessment of determining factors of materiality thresholds, determination of planning materiality, determination of performance materiality and determination of clearly trivial misstatement. Based on the analyzed literature, a model of materiality determination process was developed.","PeriodicalId":52857,"journal":{"name":"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/batp.2019.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

During audit of the financial statements of companies, the auditors use a certain level of materiality to determine both the scope of the procedures and the impact of errors on the representation of the true and fair view of the financial statements. International auditing standards leave wide range of possibilities for interpretation of the materiality process, which often raises the question of how the auditor determines materiality. The purpose of the study is to analyze the materiality process and to create a model of the materiality determination process. Methods of information gathering, comparative analysis, critical evaluation, systematization and interpretation of scientific literature and normative acts of audit are used in this article. After analyzing the materiality determination process, it was found that the materiality process consists of four steps: assessment of determining factors of materiality thresholds, determination of planning materiality, determination of performance materiality and determination of clearly trivial misstatement. Based on the analyzed literature, a model of materiality determination process was developed.
财务报告文件审计:重要性确定过程分析
在对公司财务报表进行审计期间,审计师使用一定程度的重要性来确定程序的范围以及错误对财务报表真实公允反映的影响。国际审计准则为解释实质性过程留下了广泛的可能性,这经常引发审计师如何确定实质性的问题。本研究的目的是分析实质性过程,并创建一个实质性确定过程的模型。本文采用了信息收集、比较分析、批判性评价、系统化和解释科学文献和审计规范行为的方法。在分析重要性确定过程后发现,重要性过程由四个步骤组成:评估重要性阈值的确定因素、确定规划重要性、确定绩效重要性和确定明显微不足道的错报。在分析文献的基础上,建立了物质性确定过程模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信